Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1930

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:43, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1930_placenta_Fibroblast_amniotic_chorionic_bronchogenic_Hair_bone



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:87040259..87040277,-p1@VGLL3
Hg19::chr3:87040285..87040306,-p2@VGLL3
Hg19::chr3:87040321..87040326,-p9@VGLL3
Hg19::chr3:87040342..87040351,-p6@VGLL3
Hg19::chr3:87040431..87040441,-p7@VGLL3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
non-terminally differentiated cell2.14e-22180
fibroblast1.36e-2175
skin fibroblast6.99e-1123
muscle precursor cell1.41e-0857
myoblast1.41e-0857
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell1.41e-0857
muscle cell1.13e-0754
fat cell1.77e-0715
contractile cell1.84e-0759
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
surface structure9.59e-1595
organism subdivision1.86e-13365
somite7.59e-1383
paraxial mesoderm7.59e-1383
presomitic mesoderm7.59e-1383
presumptive segmental plate7.59e-1383
trunk paraxial mesoderm7.59e-1383
presumptive paraxial mesoderm7.59e-1383
multi-tissue structure7.84e-13347
organ component layer5.04e-1257
trunk mesenchyme5.09e-12143
mesenchyme1.09e-11238
entire embryonic mesenchyme1.09e-11238
multilaminar epithelium1.60e-1182
multi-cellular organism1.69e-11659
trunk1.72e-11216
dermomyotome8.82e-1170
extraembryonic structure1.20e-1024
integument1.20e-0945
integumental system1.20e-0945
extraembryonic membrane5.55e-0914
membranous layer5.55e-0914
muscle tissue5.91e-0963
musculature5.91e-0963
musculature of body5.91e-0963
skeletal muscle tissue8.56e-0961
striated muscle tissue8.56e-0961
myotome8.56e-0961
skin of body2.84e-0840
organ part4.13e-08219
endoderm-derived structure4.33e-08169
endoderm4.33e-08169
presumptive endoderm4.33e-08169
anatomical system7.64e-08625
anatomical group1.20e-07626


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066455.360256373075030.0002259278299937090.00250086662816247
TBP#690853.706770687096390.001428755106721120.00919961495627912
TCF7L2#693448.616141250509880.0003438969725982450.00347386168112855
ZNF263#1012758.221841637010682.6606316672286e-050.000571991994017472



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.