Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1505

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:12, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1505_immature_CD19_CD4_CD8_Natural_CD14_Peripheral



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr2:24582702..24582718,+p1@AK096750
Hg19::chr3:105087602..105087625,-p@chr3:105087602..105087625
-
Hg19::chr3:105087786..105087799,+p@chr3:105087786..105087799
+
Hg19::chr3:186285012..186285017,-p@chr3:186285012..186285017
-
Hg19::chr6:26022034..26022042,-p@chr6:26022034..26022042
-
Hg19::chr7:23570219..23570230,+p@chr7:23570219..23570230
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte6.02e-31140
nongranular leukocyte5.87e-24119
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.82e-23124
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell5.55e-2352
hematopoietic stem cell1.12e-22172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.12e-22172
lymphocyte1.76e-2253
common lymphoid progenitor1.76e-2253
hematopoietic cell3.35e-20182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.36e-19165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.36e-19165
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte7.21e-1342
lymphocyte of B lineage1.06e-1124
pro-B cell1.06e-1124
classical monocyte1.12e-1145
T cell1.61e-1025
pro-T cell1.61e-1025
mature alpha-beta T cell3.13e-0918
alpha-beta T cell3.13e-0918
immature T cell3.13e-0918
mature T cell3.13e-0918
immature alpha-beta T cell3.13e-0918
B cell4.32e-0814
myeloid leukocyte2.87e-0776
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system2.83e-09102
blood island2.83e-09102
hemolymphoid system2.39e-07112
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma3.99e-08106


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CEBPB#105145.314098417216540.003008047293917460.0159827763191619
NFKB1#479043.658708949462560.01207927289015230.0438387316737192
POLR2A#543062.147453176558070.01019570676818780.0380595260262623
POU2F2#545246.070749371828350.001815326209524520.0108947738189019
SMARCC1#6599214.55445310654380.007398079383140510.0305672355380707
ZEB1#6935411.25895467836260.0001672700379805450.0020487293886068



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.