Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1820

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:26, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1820_amniotic_Corneal_Urothelial_smallcell_Alveolar_endometrial_choriocarcinoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr19:38755147..38755158,+p6@SPINT2
Hg19::chr19:38755167..38755180,+p4@SPINT2
Hg19::chr19:38755184..38755193,+p7@SPINT2
Hg19::chr19:38755203..38755228,+p1@SPINT2
Hg19::chr19:38755237..38755321,+p2@SPINT2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell5.06e-15254
endo-epithelial cell5.07e-1443
endodermal cell8.03e-0959
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
anatomical space3.02e-12104
adult organism1.35e-09115
endoderm-derived structure3.91e-09169
endoderm3.91e-09169
presumptive endoderm3.91e-09169
organ1.44e-08511
immaterial anatomical entity3.08e-08126
renal system3.90e-0845
urinary system structure4.72e-0844
trunk region element1.33e-07107
anatomical cavity1.34e-0770
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma2.46e-10106
adenocarcinoma7.37e-1025
squamous cell carcinoma8.30e-0714


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186943.925911371903460.007214984547106360.0298781035335147
EGR1#195854.988179094810140.0003237398000590710.00330832299201266
ELF1#199754.258097958807540.0007142416939776840.00573320177367884
GABPB1#255345.654147068945740.001776696502096670.0109093071892806
MYC#460955.22228187160940.0002573944848850610.00276535568428257
NRF1#4899512.21027944771093.68220991173981e-060.000120667185745903
STAT3#6774510.51946499715427.759040745861e-060.000220382501076143
TAF1#687253.343046285745290.002394600090870310.0135410492658186
TAF7#6879511.43306940492395.11611886715123e-060.000157385077574789
TBP#690853.706770687096390.001428755106721120.00919054906324509
ZEB1#6935516.88843201754397.27243686732534e-073.23202567653869e-05
ZNF263#1012758.221841637010682.6606316672286e-050.000571168983954138



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.