Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3109

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:32, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr17:64950042..64950079,+p2@Man2a1
Mm9::chr17:64950080..64950104,+p1@Man2a1
Mm9::chr17:64950108..64950120,+p4@Man2a1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
trunk7.23e-1990
trunk mesenchyme2.61e-1645
trunk region element3.52e-1479
mesenchyme2.41e-1361
entire embryonic mesenchyme2.41e-1361
immaterial anatomical entity4.38e-1279
abdomen element7.35e-1149
abdominal segment element7.35e-1149
abdominal segment of trunk7.35e-1149
abdomen7.35e-1149
endocrine system2.57e-1072
subdivision of trunk3.11e-1066
endoderm-derived structure1.11e-08118
endoderm1.11e-08118
presumptive endoderm1.11e-08118
organism subdivision1.42e-08150
liver3.09e-0822
epithelial sac3.09e-0822
digestive gland3.09e-0822
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction3.09e-0822
anatomical boundary3.09e-0822
hepatobiliary system3.09e-0822
foregut-midgut junction3.09e-0822
hepatic diverticulum3.09e-0822
liver primordium3.09e-0822
septum transversum3.09e-0822
liver bud3.09e-0822
exocrine gland3.99e-0825
exocrine system3.99e-0825
unilaminar epithelium4.11e-0866
digestive system6.38e-08116
digestive tract6.38e-08116
primitive gut6.38e-08116
subdivision of digestive tract7.00e-08114
gland7.12e-0865
digestive tract diverticulum1.57e-0723
sac1.57e-0723
endo-epithelium3.51e-0769
endocrine gland8.35e-0760


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}