Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:534

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:51, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:75272939..75272964,+p@chr11:75272939..75272964
+
Mm9::chr12:16590801..16590805,-p@chr12:16590801..16590805
-
Mm9::chr1:67175496..67175507,+p@chr1:67175496..67175507
+
Mm9::chr1:67181411..67181413,+p@chr1:67181411..67181413
+
Mm9::chr1:67183316..67183344,+p@chr1:67183316..67183344
+
Mm9::chr1:67199041..67199051,+p@chr1:67199041..67199051
+
Mm9::chr1:67275984..67276002,+p@chr1:67275984..67276002
+
Mm9::chr2:58622389..58622405,+p@chr2:58622389..58622405
+
Mm9::chr2:58622410..58622437,+p@chr2:58622410..58622437
+
Mm9::chr6:97212547..97212563,+p@chr6:97212547..97212563
+
Mm9::chr8:112519984..112520017,+p@chr8:112519984..112520017
+
Mm9::chr8:112522671..112522686,+p@chr8:112522671..112522686
+
Mm9::chr8:112522849..112522858,+p@chr8:112522849..112522858
+
Mm9::chr8:41972453..41972458,-p@chr8:41972453..41972458
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
metabolising cell4.15e-165
endopolyploid cell4.15e-165
parenchymal cell4.15e-165
polyploid cell4.15e-165
hepatocyte4.15e-165

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
liver2.13e-4622
epithelial sac2.13e-4622
digestive gland2.13e-4622
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction2.13e-4622
anatomical boundary2.13e-4622
hepatobiliary system2.13e-4622
foregut-midgut junction2.13e-4622
hepatic diverticulum2.13e-4622
liver primordium2.13e-4622
septum transversum2.13e-4622
liver bud2.13e-4622
digestive tract diverticulum2.72e-4423
sac2.72e-4423
exocrine gland1.40e-4025
exocrine system1.40e-4025
trunk mesenchyme1.30e-2445
abdomen element2.06e-2249
abdominal segment element2.06e-2249
abdominal segment of trunk2.06e-2249
abdomen2.06e-2249
epithelial tube1.45e-2047
endocrine gland7.16e-1860
mesenchyme1.54e-1761
entire embryonic mesenchyme1.54e-1761
gut epithelium3.05e-1755
gland2.59e-1665
subdivision of trunk4.98e-1666
endocrine system1.72e-1472
unilaminar epithelium5.54e-1466
endo-epithelium2.84e-1369
trunk region element5.44e-1379
immaterial anatomical entity2.71e-1179
foregut4.01e-1180
trunk4.24e-1190
subdivision of digestive tract3.20e-08114
digestive system4.91e-08116
digestive tract4.91e-08116
primitive gut4.91e-08116
endoderm-derived structure7.44e-08118
endoderm7.44e-08118
presumptive endoderm7.44e-08118
tube4.43e-07114


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}