Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3369

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:48, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr2:79475527..79475567,+p2@Ssfa2
Mm9::chr5:117570129..117570189,+p1@Taok3
Mm9::chr5:117570194..117570205,+p7@Taok3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
digestive system2.44e-13116
digestive tract2.44e-13116
primitive gut2.44e-13116
endoderm-derived structure3.01e-13118
endoderm3.01e-13118
presumptive endoderm3.01e-13118
subdivision of digestive tract1.87e-12114
intestine1.08e-1131
trunk3.25e-1190
gastrointestinal system3.81e-1147
trunk region element1.12e-0979
trunk mesenchyme1.38e-0945
digestive tract diverticulum4.86e-0923
sac4.86e-0923
exocrine gland9.58e-0925
exocrine system9.58e-0925
liver1.13e-0822
epithelial sac1.13e-0822
digestive gland1.13e-0822
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction1.13e-0822
anatomical boundary1.13e-0822
hepatobiliary system1.13e-0822
foregut-midgut junction1.13e-0822
hepatic diverticulum1.13e-0822
liver primordium1.13e-0822
septum transversum1.13e-0822
liver bud1.13e-0822
mucosa2.08e-0815
mesenchyme2.42e-0861
entire embryonic mesenchyme2.42e-0861
immaterial anatomical entity7.79e-0879
subdivision of trunk1.96e-0766
intestinal mucosa2.00e-0713
anatomical wall2.00e-0713
wall of intestine2.00e-0713
gastrointestinal system mucosa2.00e-0713


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}