Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C657

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C657_Neutrophils_cerebellum_Fibroblast_occipital_thyroid_Olfactory_CD4



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr11:65267113..65267136,- p8@BC020337
Hg19::chr11:65267144..65267219,- p1@BC020337
Hg19::chr11:65267245..65267303,- p2@BC020337
Hg19::chr11:65267319..65267347,- p7@BC020337
Hg19::chr11:65267403..65267429,- p6@BC020337
Hg19::chr11:65267987..65268091,- p1@AF130094
Hg19::chr11:65268094..65268146,- p2@AF130094
Hg19::chr11:65268153..65268171,- p4@AF130094
Hg19::chr11:65268181..65268194,- p7@AF130094
Hg19::chr11:65268214..65268240,- p5@AF130094
Hg19::chr11:65268320..65268331,- p6@AF130094
Hg19::chr11:65268339..65268367,- p3@AF130094
Hg19::chr1:171501802..171501928,- p@chr1:171501802..171501928
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset



disease_data


Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
disease of cellular proliferation1.43e-11239
cancer1.63e-11235
cell type cancer9.19e-10143


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.12.27829e-05
MA0004.10.297884
MA0006.10.169524
MA0007.10.282081
MA0009.10.724811
MA0014.10.000874969
MA0017.10.57848
MA0019.10.428118
MA0024.10.6245
MA0025.10.854131
MA0027.12.32165
MA0028.11.02527
MA0029.12.62575
MA0030.11.52819
MA0031.10.570886
MA0038.10.387473
MA0040.10.648455
MA0041.11.52302
MA0042.12.1821
MA0043.10.725115
MA0046.10.714324
MA0048.10.0323146
MA0050.14.95095
MA0051.10.383704
MA0052.10.652145
MA0055.10.0277818
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.0301256
MA0058.10.219229
MA0059.10.218203
MA0060.10.0892161
MA0061.10.0732084
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.387854
MA0067.11.03434
MA0068.10.0529803
MA0069.10.710614
MA0070.10.69985
MA0071.10.35315
MA0072.10.695528
MA0073.14.65248e-07
MA0074.10.383033
MA0076.10.655479
MA0077.10.688123
MA0078.10.473657
MA0081.10.218332
MA0083.10.732051
MA0084.11.21913
MA0087.10.693179
MA0088.10.0135703
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.243681
MA0091.10.30011
MA0092.10.268302
MA0093.10.171791
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.399896
MA0101.10.17426
MA0103.10.162663
MA0105.10.0255214
MA0106.10.424592
MA0107.10.385539
MA0108.20.568002
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.254772
MA0113.10.439505
MA0114.10.118142
MA0115.10.959312
MA0116.10.123927
MA0117.10.76111
MA0119.15.06628
MA0122.10.786181
MA0124.10.918678
MA0125.10.83671
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.490408
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.10.754112
MA0136.10.393782
MA0139.10.0663461
MA0140.10.350813
MA0141.10.619886
MA0142.10.541045
MA0143.10.439666
MA0144.12.34047
MA0145.10.0164225
MA0146.10.000600379
MA0147.10.126316
MA0148.10.319209
MA0149.10.342334
MA0062.20.900923
MA0035.20.350194
MA0039.23.59348e-05
MA0138.20.474787
MA0002.23.31692
MA0137.21.65057
MA0104.20.088751
MA0047.20.413608
MA0112.20.888079
MA0065.20.0171659
MA0150.10.238884
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.356591
MA0153.10.820317
MA0154.10.105196
MA0155.10.0132945
MA0156.11.6604
MA0157.10.515488
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.126752
MA0160.10.884483
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.00205586
MA0163.10.000991488
MA0164.11.99707
MA0080.20.171855
MA0018.20.425847
MA0099.20.356906
MA0079.23.15725e-10
MA0102.21.25596
MA0258.10.102521
MA0259.10.132107
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BCLAF1#97741118.32147105471851.4497178686745e-132.22985396887329e-11
CHD2#110653.978470320814180.005583686566840480.0252535354821693
CTCF#1066483.298619306507710.0007662457105104630.0060165352800543
EGR1#195872.685942589513150.007097606783478520.0295962211474772
ETS1#2113107.483662247847952.8004675253017e-081.91788870737694e-06
GATA1#262377.301704385123311.36389762452687e-050.00033034346940622
GATA3#2625510.475583214316.69372606020604e-050.00107041196754227
HEY1#23462123.729333270559125.29816955260946e-072.4713511831397e-05
POLR2A#5430121.982264470668990.0007703649959180760.0060411585680048
POU2F2#5452107.00471081364815.31299322912892e-083.37520498696469e-06
REST#597864.45385940744370.001112236766968470.00772089702262682
SIN3A#2594272.9124763913620.004434177171369990.0209899392467348
SIX5#14791245.257450878602770.005466268737389780.0247578663716662
SP1#666793.945033261789855.6824033461029e-050.000949847188001986
TAF7#68791210.55360252762212.38691125982095e-123.23328955985007e-10
WRNIP1#56897542.23844782668317.53782827111157e-084.53742505364047e-06
ZBTB33#1000949.742992316917280.0005650138104002380.0048198543938896



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.