Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C836

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C836_Preadipocyte_osteoclastoma_Ewing_Fibroblast_Adipocyte_Osteoblast_hepatic



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr15:68594466..68594499,-p@chr15:68594466..68594499
-
Hg19::chr15:68594930..68594941,-p@chr15:68594930..68594941
-
Hg19::chr15:68594981..68594992,-p@chr15:68594981..68594992
-
Hg19::chr15:68595021..68595035,-p@chr15:68595021..68595035
-
Hg19::chr15:68595063..68595078,-p@chr15:68595063..68595078
-
Hg19::chr15:68624258..68624272,-p@chr15:68624258..68624272
-
Hg19::chr15:68695318..68695340,-p@chr15:68695318..68695340
-
Hg19::chr15:68724490..68724516,-p1@ITGA11
Hg19::chr15:68724518..68724531,-p2@ITGA11
Hg19::chr15:68724544..68724555,-p3@ITGA11


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fibroblast1.00e-2176
non-terminally differentiated cell1.91e-10106
skin fibroblast7.04e-1023
multi fate stem cell1.57e-09427
somatic stem cell5.90e-09433
preadipocyte6.92e-0912
stem cell3.17e-08441
stromal cell1.47e-0728
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
omentum7.78e-096
peritoneum7.78e-096
abdominal cavity7.78e-096
visceral peritoneum7.78e-096
connective tissue1.90e-07371


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.839169
MA0004.10.380329
MA0006.10.236135
MA0007.10.363007
MA0009.10.828613
MA0014.10.15363
MA0017.10.270554
MA0019.10.520264
MA0024.10.725404
MA0025.10.960689
MA0027.12.43535
MA0028.10.697761
MA0029.10.744375
MA0030.10.733118
MA0031.10.669876
MA0038.10.477043
MA0040.10.750125
MA0041.10.397617
MA0042.10.367902
MA0043.10.828925
MA0046.10.817858
MA0048.10.480635
MA0050.10.368721
MA0051.10.473017
MA0052.10.753928
MA0055.10.174262
MA0056.10
MA0057.11.70795
MA0058.10.293055
MA0059.10.291897
MA0060.10.430116
MA0061.13.1466
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.477449
MA0067.11.1435
MA0068.10.304755
MA0069.10.814052
MA0070.10.803003
MA0071.10.440254
MA0072.10.798564
MA0073.12.52017
MA0074.10.4723
MA0076.10.307383
MA0077.10.790956
MA0078.10.568317
MA0081.10.79376
MA0083.10.836033
MA0084.11.32998
MA0087.10.79615
MA0088.10.873421
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.857892
MA0091.10.382762
MA0092.10.347826
MA0093.10.238771
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.49029
MA0101.10.241637
MA0103.10.228129
MA0105.12.12449
MA0106.10.516528
MA0107.11.01551
MA0108.20.666881
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.33284
MA0113.10.532314
MA0114.10.51954
MA0115.11.06753
MA0116.10.536665
MA0117.10.865782
MA0119.10.277531
MA0122.12.0644
MA0124.11.0263
MA0125.10.942948
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.585907
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.10.858623
MA0136.10.483775
MA0139.10.716757
MA0140.11.95291
MA0141.10.290336
MA0142.10.638837
MA0143.10.532484
MA0144.10.163394
MA0145.12.90338
MA0146.10.243477
MA0147.10.543675
MA0148.10.403564
MA0149.11.09589
MA0062.20.740103
MA0035.20.437071
MA0039.20.0317541
MA0138.21.39695
MA0002.20.129981
MA0137.20.255808
MA0104.20.428616
MA0047.20.504873
MA0112.20.573053
MA0065.20.147044
MA0150.10.315136
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.443956
MA0153.10.926242
MA0154.13.95172
MA0155.10.296882
MA0156.10.257809
MA0157.10.612166
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.185458
MA0160.10.417847
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.0377269
MA0163.10.0235237
MA0164.10.544294
MA0080.20.671553
MA0018.20.517858
MA0099.20.444294
MA0079.20.300798
MA0102.21.36707
MA0258.10.155735
MA0259.10.191914
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
SUZ12#23512315.03473427331890.0008575295983126410.00645381088983022



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.