Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C815


Revision as of 11:52, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Full id: C815_Basophils_Eosinophils_CD14_Mast_Peripheral_CD34_CD14CD16

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr12:13253999..13254015,- p@chr12:13253999..13254015
Hg19::chr14:75725551..75725560,- p@chr14:75725551..75725560
Hg19::chr14:75725567..75725572,- p@chr14:75725567..75725572
Hg19::chr14:75725579..75725612,- p@chr14:75725579..75725612
Hg19::chr14:75725628..75725642,- p@chr14:75725628..75725642
Hg19::chr14:75743949..75743996,+ p@chr14:75743949..75743996
Hg19::chr19:6057282..6057313,- p@chr19:6057282..6057313
Hg19::chr2:196933270..196933275,+ p@chr2:196933270..196933275
Hg19::chr6:159463538..159463554,+ p@chr6:159463538..159463554
Hg19::chr9:36152083..36152105,+ p@chr9:36152083..36152105

Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte2.56e-2642
classical monocyte9.60e-2445
myeloid leukocyte1.17e-1976
hematopoietic stem cell5.38e-18172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell5.38e-18172
nongranular leukocyte1.42e-17119
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell7.70e-17124
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell1.36e-1671
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor7.57e-1665
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.19e-15165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.19e-15165
monopoietic cell6.07e-1563
hematopoietic cell7.08e-15182
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.63e-1470
myeloid cell8.50e-13112
common myeloid progenitor8.50e-13112
intermediate monocyte2.81e-079
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte2.81e-079
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.35e-18102
blood island1.35e-18102
bone element9.78e-1686
bone marrow1.31e-1580
hemolymphoid system1.63e-14112
skeletal element4.18e-11101
skeletal system4.18e-11101
immune system3.17e-09115

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs

Jaspar motifs

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.

link to data source

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.