Coexpression cluster:C1043

Full id: C1043_keratoacanthoma_Prostate_tongue_amniotic_salivary_skin_esophagus

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr15:90818559..90818567,+	p2@AK098314
Hg19::chr15:90818696..90818716,+	p1@AK098314
Hg19::chr6:138413151..138413166,-	p@chr6:138413151..138413166 -
Hg19::chr6:138413287..138413316,+	p@chr6:138413287..138413316 +
Hg19::chr6:138413333..138413389,-	p@chr6:138413333..138413389 -
Hg19::chr6:138417591..138417635,-	p@chr6:138417591..138417635 -
Hg19::chr6:138428294..138428318,-	p5@PERP
Hg19::chr6:138428324..138428337,-	p4@PERP

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>

---

Cell Type

Ontology term	p-value	n
epithelial cell	7.58e-37	254
endo-epithelial cell	9.00e-16	43
embryonic cell	5.51e-15	248
endodermal cell	6.11e-15	59
epithelial cell of alimentary canal	7.87e-10	21
squamous epithelial cell	1.22e-08	62
ecto-epithelial cell	1.98e-08	33

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
endoderm-derived structure	1.68e-20	169
endoderm	1.68e-20	169
presumptive endoderm	1.68e-20	169
digestive system	3.42e-16	155
digestive tract	3.42e-16	155
primitive gut	3.42e-16	155
respiratory system	5.26e-14	72
subdivision of digestive tract	5.52e-13	129
endodermal part of digestive tract	5.52e-13	129
orifice	1.68e-12	35
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure	5.74e-12	130
anatomical space	1.54e-10	104
reproductive structure	3.11e-10	59
reproductive system	3.11e-10	59
mesenchyme	4.25e-10	238
entire embryonic mesenchyme	4.25e-10	238
oral opening	9.25e-10	21
surface structure	1.39e-09	95
immaterial anatomical entity	3.25e-09	126
multi-cellular organism	7.30e-09	659
foregut	8.92e-09	98
respiratory tract	1.62e-08	53
female organism	4.26e-08	41
mouth	4.80e-08	28
stomodeum	4.80e-08	28
multi-tissue structure	5.37e-08	347
trunk	6.62e-08	216
reproductive organ	8.62e-08	48
respiratory primordium	1.22e-07	38
endoderm of foregut	1.22e-07	38
female reproductive organ	4.33e-07	37
female reproductive system	4.33e-07	37
segment of respiratory tract	4.81e-07	46
organism subdivision	5.43e-07	365
primordium	8.47e-07	168
anatomical cavity	9.72e-07	70

Disease

Ontology term	p-value	n
carcinoma	1.82e-12	106
cell type cancer	8.29e-10	143

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.