Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2640

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:47, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:117060955..117060977,+p11@Sept9
Mm9::chr11:117060992..117061006,+p14@Sept9
Mm9::chr11:117061017..117061043,+p4@Sept9


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell5.25e-0825
endodermal cell5.70e-0720

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure1.75e-24118
endoderm1.75e-24118
presumptive endoderm1.75e-24118
digestive system1.70e-23116
digestive tract1.70e-23116
primitive gut1.70e-23116
subdivision of digestive tract3.30e-22114
gastrointestinal system3.32e-1547
intestine8.44e-1431
trunk region element7.18e-1179
exocrine gland6.74e-1025
exocrine system6.74e-1025
organ component layer1.13e-0924
immaterial anatomical entity1.17e-0979
mucosa5.51e-0915
digestive tract diverticulum8.33e-0923
sac8.33e-0923
foregut1.34e-0880
liver1.49e-0822
epithelial sac1.49e-0822
digestive gland1.49e-0822
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction1.49e-0822
anatomical boundary1.49e-0822
hepatobiliary system1.49e-0822
foregut-midgut junction1.49e-0822
hepatic diverticulum1.49e-0822
liver primordium1.49e-0822
septum transversum1.49e-0822
liver bud1.49e-0822
subdivision of trunk1.76e-0866
endo-epithelium6.43e-0869
intestinal mucosa8.27e-0813
anatomical wall8.27e-0813
wall of intestine8.27e-0813
gastrointestinal system mucosa8.27e-0813
gut epithelium9.42e-0855
trunk1.58e-0790
abdomen element5.33e-0749
abdominal segment element5.33e-0749
abdominal segment of trunk5.33e-0749
abdomen5.33e-0749


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}