Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C943

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:54, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C943_Mesenchymal_Preadipocyte_Fibroblast_Adipocyte_Synoviocyte_Hair_Mesothelial



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:13590619..13590632,+p2@FBLN2
Hg19::chr3:13590636..13590667,+p1@FBLN2
Hg19::chr3:13612049..13612061,+p@chr3:13612049..13612061
+
Hg19::chr3:13612234..13612246,+p@chr3:13612234..13612246
+
Hg19::chr3:13612256..13612291,+p@chr3:13612256..13612291
+
Hg19::chr3:13612325..13612337,+p@chr3:13612325..13612337
+
Hg19::chr3:13612343..13612379,+p@chr3:13612343..13612379
+
Hg19::chr3:13612408..13612437,+p@chr3:13612408..13612437
+
Hg19::chr3:13670704..13670708,+p@chr3:13670704..13670708
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fibroblast8.51e-1776
preadipocyte1.50e-1112
fat cell2.00e-1115
skin fibroblast2.04e-0823
cardiocyte7.58e-0716
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
primary circulatory organ4.55e-1227
heart6.63e-1224
primitive heart tube6.63e-1224
primary heart field6.63e-1224
anterior lateral plate mesoderm6.63e-1224
heart tube6.63e-1224
heart primordium6.63e-1224
cardiac mesoderm6.63e-1224
cardiogenic plate6.63e-1224
heart rudiment6.63e-1224
integument9.34e-1146
integumental system9.34e-1146
adipose tissue1.43e-1014
omentum6.70e-086
peritoneum6.70e-086
abdominal cavity6.70e-086
visceral peritoneum6.70e-086
skin of body1.33e-0741
blood vessel layer3.76e-077
surface structure6.87e-0799
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm8.77e-0783


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066463.573504248716680.002103883629372150.0121665283703211
RAD21#588566.903355930304225.2568380699896e-050.000893585467434317



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.