Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2994

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:15, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr15:74786041..74786059,+p2@Ly6e
Mm9::chr15:74786070..74786090,+p1@Ly6e
Mm9::chr15:74789277..74789308,-p@chr15:74789277..74789308
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
common myeloid progenitor1.17e-0819
connective tissue cell1.68e-0746
mesenchymal cell1.68e-0746
myeloid cell5.34e-0716

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
trunk region element7.69e-1379
trunk8.86e-1390
hematopoietic system4.77e-1045
blood island4.77e-1045
subdivision of trunk5.19e-1066
hemolymphoid system1.26e-0948
immune system1.26e-0948
immaterial anatomical entity2.81e-0979
foregut5.96e-0980
organism subdivision6.07e-09150
bone marrow8.88e-0916
endocrine system6.01e-0872
mesoderm6.81e-08120
mesoderm-derived structure6.81e-08120
presumptive mesoderm6.81e-08120
organ7.70e-08266
connective tissue1.68e-0746
gland2.23e-0765
abdomen element2.99e-0749
abdominal segment element2.99e-0749
abdominal segment of trunk2.99e-0749
abdomen2.99e-0749
anatomical space7.45e-0757


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}