Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3375

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:49, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr2:92232598..92232651,-p2@Mapk8ip1
Mm9::chr2:92232654..92232680,-p6@Mapk8ip1
Mm9::chr2:92232791..92232811,-p4@Mapk8ip1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
ectodermal cell7.20e-1344
neurectodermal cell7.20e-1344
neural cell1.69e-1243
neuron3.32e-1133
neuronal stem cell3.32e-1133
neuroblast3.32e-1133
electrically signaling cell3.32e-1133
non-terminally differentiated cell3.50e-0949
electrically responsive cell1.07e-0739
electrically active cell1.07e-0739

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system1.00e-3073
nervous system3.24e-2975
ectoderm-derived structure4.16e-2395
ectoderm4.16e-2395
presumptive ectoderm4.16e-2395
neurectoderm1.83e-2164
neural plate1.83e-2164
presumptive neural plate1.83e-2164
regional part of nervous system7.37e-2154
neural tube1.72e-1952
neural rod1.72e-1952
future spinal cord1.72e-1952
neural keel1.72e-1952
ecto-epithelium9.63e-1873
brain5.59e-1747
future brain5.59e-1747
regional part of brain2.49e-1646
structure with developmental contribution from neural crest8.34e-1592
pre-chordal neural plate9.15e-1549
anterior neural tube1.71e-1440
regional part of forebrain7.72e-1439
forebrain7.72e-1439
future forebrain7.72e-1439
gray matter1.33e-1034
multi-cellular organism2.54e-10333
brain grey matter1.90e-0829
regional part of telencephalon1.90e-0829
telencephalon1.90e-0829
diencephalon5.23e-0710
future diencephalon5.23e-0710


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}