Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3904

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:42, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3904_CD14_Mast_CD19_Neutrophils_CD4_Eosinophils_CD8



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr1:171454639..171454657,+p2@PRRC2C
Hg19::chr1:171454659..171454723,+p1@PRRC2C
Hg19::chr7:23571586..23571610,-p1@TRA2A


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0000375RNA splicing, via transesterification reactions0.0185446838572942
GO:0000398nuclear mRNA splicing, via spliceosome0.0185446838572942
GO:0000377RNA splicing, via transesterification reactions with bulged adenosine as nucleophile0.0185446838572942
GO:0008380RNA splicing0.0413281525962557
GO:0006397mRNA processing0.0413281525962557
GO:0016071mRNA metabolic process0.0413281525962557
GO:0042802identical protein binding0.0413281525962557



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte1.68e-31140
hematopoietic stem cell3.13e-30172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.13e-30172
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell3.04e-28165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell3.04e-28165
hematopoietic cell1.17e-26182
nongranular leukocyte4.92e-24119
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.24e-23124
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.34e-1542
classical monocyte2.20e-1545
myeloid cell5.02e-15112
common myeloid progenitor5.02e-15112
myeloid leukocyte1.22e-1476
lymphocyte4.41e-1353
common lymphoid progenitor4.41e-1353
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.09e-1252
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.31e-1271
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor8.38e-1165
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.77e-1070
monopoietic cell4.37e-1063
monocyte4.37e-1063
monoblast4.37e-1063
promonocyte4.37e-1063
mature alpha-beta T cell5.10e-0718
alpha-beta T cell5.10e-0718
immature T cell5.10e-0718
mature T cell5.10e-0718
immature alpha-beta T cell5.10e-0718
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.06e-13102
blood island1.06e-13102
hemolymphoid system3.46e-11112
bone element1.52e-0986
bone marrow1.96e-0980
skeletal element2.63e-07101
skeletal system2.63e-07101
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
cancer9.60e-08235
disease of cellular proliferation2.79e-07239


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.