Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C820

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:58, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C820_cervical_tongue_esophagus_throat_tonsil_oral_uterus



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:57328113..57328161,-p2@SDR9C7
Hg19::chr17:39661947..39661969,-p2@KRT13
Hg19::chr18:61253887..61253899,+p7@SERPINB13
Hg19::chr18:61254400..61254410,+p8@SERPINB13
Hg19::chr18:61254548..61254562,+p3@SERPINB13
Hg19::chr18:61254570..61254585,+p2@SERPINB13
Hg19::chr18:61254622..61254641,+p1@SERPINB13
Hg19::chr18:61265362..61265366,+p@chr18:61265362..61265366
+
Hg19::chr19:51569044..51569051,-p@chr19:51569044..51569051
-
Hg19::chr4:68995571..68995593,-p1@TMPRSS11F


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
endo-epithelial cell3.41e-1843
endodermal cell6.71e-1259
respiratory epithelial cell5.12e-1113
epithelial cell of alimentary canal1.16e-1021
epithelial cell1.88e-10254
general ecto-epithelial cell6.58e-1013
acinar cell9.14e-085
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
respiratory system1.21e-1672
endoderm-derived structure9.96e-13169
endoderm9.96e-13169
presumptive endoderm9.96e-13169
orifice3.04e-1135
oral opening3.58e-1121
respiratory tract6.27e-1153
thoracic segment organ1.55e-0935
digestive system6.15e-09155
digestive tract6.15e-09155
primitive gut6.15e-09155
thoracic cavity element7.35e-0934
thoracic cavity7.35e-0934
mouth1.35e-0828
stomodeum1.35e-0828
neck1.68e-0810
mouth mucosa7.86e-085
urothelium1.93e-075
subdivision of digestive tract2.61e-07129
endodermal part of digestive tract2.61e-07129
anatomical space3.13e-07104
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
squamous cell carcinoma3.75e-1514


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.