Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2230

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:08, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr18:11052456..11052477,+p3@Gata6
Mm9::chr18:11052485..11052508,+p2@Gata6
Mm9::chr18:11052516..11052525,+p5@Gata6
Mm9::chr18:11052857..11052890,-p1@ENSMUST00000133759
p1@uc008ebi.1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0003705RNA polymerase II transcription factor activity, enhancer binding0.0350901221716978
GO:0001889liver development0.0350901221716978



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
intestine6.66e-1331
cardiovascular system1.01e-1223
circulatory system1.01e-1223
gastrointestinal system3.81e-1247
primary circulatory organ2.17e-1118
heart2.17e-1118
primitive heart tube2.17e-1118
primary heart field2.17e-1118
anterior lateral plate mesoderm2.17e-1118
heart tube2.17e-1118
heart primordium2.17e-1118
cardiac mesoderm2.17e-1118
cardiogenic plate2.17e-1118
heart rudiment2.17e-1118
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm5.42e-1033
anatomical space3.25e-0957
epithelial tube5.13e-0947
immaterial anatomical entity6.16e-0979
body cavity6.97e-0837
body cavity or lining6.97e-0837
body cavity precursor1.69e-0738
anatomical cavity3.91e-0739
endoderm-derived structure5.26e-07118
endoderm5.26e-07118
presumptive endoderm5.26e-07118
digestive system5.76e-07116
digestive tract5.76e-07116
primitive gut5.76e-07116
trunk6.66e-0790


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}