Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2166

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:00, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr15:97923760..97923841,-p1@Senp1
Mm9::chr17:95149311..95149386,-p1@Mettl4
Mm9::chr7:105805302..105805323,-p2@2210018M11Rik
Mm9::chr9:14589104..14589146,+p1@Mre11a


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0016926protein desumoylation0.0214674565278059
GO:0006281DNA repair0.0214674565278059
GO:0006974response to DNA damage stimulus0.0214674565278059
GO:0009719response to endogenous stimulus0.0214674565278059
GO:0005634nucleus0.0335863956990852



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
anterior region of body1.09e-1143
hemopoietic organ6.16e-1129
immune organ6.16e-1129
craniocervical region1.11e-0936
primordium1.05e-08134
thymus1.23e-0823
neck1.23e-0823
respiratory system epithelium1.23e-0823
hemolymphoid system gland1.23e-0823
pharyngeal epithelium1.23e-0823
thymic region1.23e-0823
pharyngeal gland1.23e-0823
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm1.23e-0823
thymus primordium1.23e-0823
early pharyngeal endoderm1.23e-0823
gland of gut2.09e-0824
pharynx2.48e-0824
upper respiratory tract2.48e-0824
chordate pharynx2.48e-0824
pharyngeal arch system2.48e-0824
pharyngeal region of foregut2.48e-0824
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure3.61e-0835
respiratory tract9.62e-0841
respiratory system1.20e-0742
hemolymphoid system3.65e-0748
immune system3.65e-0748
hematopoietic system3.67e-0745
blood island3.67e-0745


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}