Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2527

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:33, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:127213401..127213412,+p3@Rdh9
Mm9::chr10:127213430..127213463,+p1@Rdh9
Mm9::chr10:127213492..127213499,+p5@Rdh9


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell9.87e-0925
brush border epithelial cell2.86e-086
gut absorptive cell2.86e-086
absorptive cell2.86e-086
enterocyte2.86e-086
columnar/cuboidal epithelial cell5.11e-077

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
intestine3.59e-2031
digestive system7.04e-16116
digestive tract7.04e-16116
primitive gut7.04e-16116
gastrointestinal system1.02e-1547
endoderm-derived structure1.88e-15118
endoderm1.88e-15118
presumptive endoderm1.88e-15118
digestive tract diverticulum8.96e-1523
sac8.96e-1523
subdivision of digestive tract3.81e-14114
mucosa5.65e-1415
liver1.88e-1322
epithelial sac1.88e-1322
digestive gland1.88e-1322
epithelium of foregut-midgut junction1.88e-1322
anatomical boundary1.88e-1322
hepatobiliary system1.88e-1322
foregut-midgut junction1.88e-1322
hepatic diverticulum1.88e-1322
liver primordium1.88e-1322
septum transversum1.88e-1322
liver bud1.88e-1322
exocrine gland1.95e-1125
exocrine system1.95e-1125
intestinal mucosa2.59e-1113
anatomical wall2.59e-1113
wall of intestine2.59e-1113
gastrointestinal system mucosa2.59e-1113
small intestine1.21e-084
gut epithelium7.55e-0855
organ component layer8.72e-0824
ileal mucosa5.87e-073
ileum5.87e-073
mucosa of small intestine5.87e-073
wall of small intestine5.87e-073


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}