Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1516

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1516_amniotic_Fibroblast_Hair_Amniotic_Placental_Chondrocyte_liposarcoma



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:55515183..55515192,-p12@WNT5A
Hg19::chr3:55515202..55515209,-p15@WNT5A
Hg19::chr3:55515368..55515393,-p1@WNT5A
Hg19::chr3:55515400..55515437,-p3@WNT5A
Hg19::chr3:55515438..55515465,-p4@WNT5A
Hg19::chr3:55515558..55515584,-p18@WNT5A


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>

Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
fibroblast1.55e-1676
skin fibroblast4.23e-1223
extraembryonic cell1.82e-1019
muscle precursor cell3.52e-0958
myoblast3.52e-0958
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell3.52e-0958
non-terminally differentiated cell7.24e-09106
muscle cell4.96e-0855
contractile cell3.59e-0759
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
surface structure7.46e-1299
dense mesenchyme tissue2.92e-1173
paraxial mesoderm8.38e-1172
presumptive paraxial mesoderm8.38e-1172
somite9.60e-1171
presomitic mesoderm9.60e-1171
presumptive segmental plate9.60e-1171
dermomyotome9.60e-1171
trunk paraxial mesoderm9.60e-1171
integument4.00e-1046
integumental system4.00e-1046
extraembryonic membrane5.31e-1014
membranous layer5.31e-1014
epithelial vesicle1.99e-0978
multilaminar epithelium4.15e-0983
multi-tissue structure5.98e-09342
skin of body9.19e-0941
organ component layer9.85e-0866
extraembryonic structure9.86e-0824
skeletal muscle tissue1.07e-0762
striated muscle tissue1.07e-0762
myotome1.07e-0762
muscle tissue2.11e-0764
musculature2.11e-0764
musculature of body2.11e-0764
trunk mesenchyme2.43e-07122
somatic layer of lateral plate mesoderm2.73e-078
amnion3.58e-077
organism subdivision4.32e-07264
larynx9.60e-079
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
ovarian cancer1.13e-0714


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.11.04263
MA0004.10.558729
MA0006.10.391183
MA0007.10.539222
MA0009.11.03681
MA0014.10.262822
MA0017.10.432438
MA0019.10.7124
MA0024.10.929647
MA0025.11.17262
MA0027.12.65688
MA0028.10.408079
MA0029.10.949428
MA0030.10.937696
MA0031.10.871496
MA0038.10.665566
MA0040.10.955415
MA0041.10.578072
MA0042.10.544748
MA0043.11.03713
MA0046.11.02569
MA0048.11.45353
MA0050.10.545671
MA0051.10.661179
MA0052.10.959373
MA0055.10.213007
MA0056.10
MA0057.11.41984
MA0058.10.458909
MA0059.10.457555
MA0060.10.267412
MA0061.10.23892
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.66601
MA0067.11.35893
MA0068.10.199491
MA0069.11.02175
MA0070.11.01032
MA0071.10.625297
MA0072.11.00572
MA0073.16.58138
MA0074.10.660398
MA0076.10.475586
MA0077.10.997832
MA0078.10.763954
MA0081.10.457725
MA0083.11.04447
MA0084.11.5477
MA0087.11.00322
MA0088.10.660742
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.490736
MA0091.10.561458
MA0092.11.29635
MA0093.10.394379
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.679972
MA0101.11.81721
MA0103.10.381434
MA0105.10.419295
MA0106.10.70837
MA0107.10.857383
MA0108.20.868347
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.504913
MA0113.10.725375
MA0114.10.314898
MA0115.11.28169
MA0116.10.323925
MA0117.11.07516
MA0119.10.440684
MA0122.11.10154
MA0124.11.23968
MA0125.11.15445
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.782708
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.06778
MA0136.10.672893
MA0139.11.86787
MA0140.10.622527
MA0141.10.455728
MA0142.10.838805
MA0143.10.725558
MA0144.10.299851
MA0145.10.107156
MA0146.11.05598
MA0147.10.327615
MA0148.10.584698
MA0149.10.612449
MA0062.20.23336
MA0035.20.621793
MA0039.20.35955
MA0138.20.765223
MA0002.20.255126
MA0137.20.414885
MA0104.20.26661
MA0047.20.695777
MA0112.21.65732
MA0065.20.354331
MA0150.10.484557
MA0151.10
MA0152.11.52275
MA0153.11.13732
MA0154.13.32265
MA0155.13.55553
MA0156.11.07131
MA0157.10.810597
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.328286
MA0160.10.600559
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.150673
MA0163.15.79417
MA0164.10.738243
MA0080.20.394469
MA0018.20.709805
MA0099.20.629739
MA0079.25.1832
MA0102.21.58513
MA0258.10.289793
MA0259.10.336472
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCF#1066465.360256373075034.21437267579784e-050.000755743248433466



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.

Retrieved from "http://f5-webapp4.gsc.riken.jp/resource_browser/index.php?title=Coexpression_cluster:C1516&oldid=3068633"