Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C799

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C799_chronic_leukemia_acute_Mast_choriocarcinoma_chorionic_non



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr11:36127154..36127161,+ p@chr11:36127154..36127161
+
Hg19::chr11:59866802..59866805,- p@chr11:59866802..59866805
-
Hg19::chr11:59876093..59876098,- p@chr11:59876093..59876098
-
Hg19::chr15:33440788..33440802,+ p@chr15:33440788..33440802
+
Hg19::chr1:6214945..6214961,- p@chr1:6214945..6214961
-
Hg19::chr1:6215048..6215068,- p@chr1:6215048..6215068
-
Hg19::chr1:6215070..6215094,- p@chr1:6215070..6215094
-
Hg19::chr7:150654795..150654806,- p@chr7:150654795..150654806
-
Hg19::chr7:24835061..24835083,- p@chr7:24835061..24835083
-
Hg19::chr7:24835152..24835163,- p@chr7:24835152..24835163
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data

disease_data


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
myeloid cell4.22e-08108
common myeloid progenitor4.22e-08108
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
chronic myeloid leukemia2.42e-501
myeloid leukemia2.93e-2631
chronic leukemia9.81e-268
leukemia4.38e-2139
hematologic cancer2.36e-1651
immune system cancer2.36e-1651


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.1987
MA0004.10.380329
MA0006.10.236135
MA0007.10.363007
MA0009.10.828613
MA0014.10.0216849
MA0017.10.270554
MA0019.10.520264
MA0024.11.7227
MA0025.10.960689
MA0027.12.43535
MA0028.10.25013
MA0029.10.744375
MA0030.10.733118
MA0031.10.669876
MA0038.10.477043
MA0040.10.750125
MA0041.10.397617
MA0042.10.367902
MA0043.10.828925
MA0046.11.91352
MA0048.10.0613414
MA0050.10.368721
MA0051.10.473017
MA0052.10.753928
MA0055.10.014035
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.802927
MA0058.10.293055
MA0059.10.291897
MA0060.10.430116
MA0061.10.118318
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.477449
MA0067.11.1435
MA0068.10.0911063
MA0069.10.814052
MA0070.10.803003
MA0071.11.12112
MA0072.10.798564
MA0073.125.7375
MA0074.10.4723
MA0076.10.307383
MA0077.10.790956
MA0078.10.568317
MA0081.10.79376
MA0083.11.95087
MA0084.11.32998
MA0087.10.79615
MA0088.10.300184
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.320494
MA0091.10.382762
MA0092.10.918839
MA0093.10.238771
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.49029
MA0101.11.25862
MA0103.11.20737
MA0105.10.422512
MA0106.10.516528
MA0107.11.01551
MA0108.20.666881
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.33284
MA0113.10.532314
MA0114.10.51954
MA0115.11.06753
MA0116.10.536665
MA0117.10.865782
MA0119.10.760742
MA0122.10.891407
MA0124.11.0263
MA0125.10.942948
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.585907
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.10.858623
MA0136.10.483775
MA0139.10.353333
MA0140.11.11568
MA0141.10.789887
MA0142.10.638837
MA0143.10.532484
MA0144.10.163394
MA0145.10.0359093
MA0146.10.0551603
MA0147.10.184931
MA0148.10.403564
MA0149.10.428597
MA0062.20.366815
MA0035.20.437071
MA0039.21.19069
MA0138.20.569505
MA0002.24.07489
MA0137.20.255808
MA0104.20.138396
MA0047.20.504873
MA0112.20.0329985
MA0065.20.615279
MA0150.10.315136
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.443956
MA0153.10.926242
MA0154.10.0494985
MA0155.11.6917
MA0156.10.257809
MA0157.10.612166
MA0158.10
MA0159.12.33654
MA0160.10.417847
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.108522
MA0163.10.484115
MA0164.10.544294
MA0080.20.671553
MA0018.20.517858
MA0099.20.444294
MA0079.20.0179307
MA0102.21.36707
MA0258.10.155735
MA0259.10.191914
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.