Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:736

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:10, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr16:32736349..32736367,+p1@Muc4
Mm9::chr16:32736372..32736390,+p2@Muc4
Mm9::chr16:32750563..32750607,+p@chr16:32750563..32750607
+
Mm9::chr16:32750719..32750734,+p@chr16:32750719..32750734
+
Mm9::chr16:32750966..32750986,+p@chr16:32750966..32750986
+
Mm9::chr16:32751031..32751115,+p@chr16:32751031..32751115
+
Mm9::chr16:32751228..32751251,+p@chr16:32751228..32751251
+
Mm9::chr16:32751311..32751323,+p@chr16:32751311..32751323
+
Mm9::chr16:32751423..32751440,+p@chr16:32751423..32751440
+
Mm9::chr16:32755720..32755726,+p@chr16:32755720..32755726
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
gastrointestinal system4.20e-1747
endoderm-derived structure3.57e-15118
endoderm3.57e-15118
presumptive endoderm3.57e-15118
digestive system3.08e-14116
digestive tract3.08e-14116
primitive gut3.08e-14116
subdivision of digestive tract4.25e-13114
intestine5.77e-1331
thoracic cavity element8.47e-1317
thoracic segment organ8.47e-1317
thoracic cavity8.47e-1317
thoracic segment of trunk8.47e-1317
respiratory primordium8.47e-1317
endoderm of foregut8.47e-1317
epithelial bud2.31e-1017
lung1.68e-0914
respiratory tube1.68e-0914
respiration organ1.68e-0914
pair of lungs1.68e-0914
lung primordium1.68e-0914
lung bud1.68e-0914
female organism1.93e-0811
epithelial fold3.78e-0820


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}