Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1275

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:37, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:115323778..115323797,+p1@Slc16a5
Mm9::chr15:95621262..95621290,+p1@Ano6
Mm9::chr15:95621291..95621305,+p4@Ano6
Mm9::chr15:95621315..95621331,+p3@Ano6
Mm9::chr15:95621334..95621345,+p6@Ano6
Mm9::chr2:180976725..180976753,-p2@BC006779


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
intestine2.47e-1131
endoderm-derived structure2.29e-09118
endoderm2.29e-09118
presumptive endoderm2.29e-09118
respiratory tract2.76e-0941
digestive system3.05e-09116
digestive tract3.05e-09116
primitive gut3.05e-09116
respiratory system1.12e-0842
subdivision of digestive tract1.72e-08114
mucosa8.34e-0815
gastrointestinal system2.09e-0747
thymus2.72e-0723
neck2.72e-0723
respiratory system epithelium2.72e-0723
hemolymphoid system gland2.72e-0723
pharyngeal epithelium2.72e-0723
thymic region2.72e-0723
pharyngeal gland2.72e-0723
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm2.72e-0723
thymus primordium2.72e-0723
early pharyngeal endoderm2.72e-0723
pharynx6.62e-0724
upper respiratory tract6.62e-0724
chordate pharynx6.62e-0724
pharyngeal arch system6.62e-0724
pharyngeal region of foregut6.62e-0724
intestinal mucosa8.73e-0713
anatomical wall8.73e-0713
wall of intestine8.73e-0713
gastrointestinal system mucosa8.73e-0713
hemopoietic organ9.06e-0729
immune organ9.06e-0729


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}