Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4749

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:56, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4749_Mesenchymal_Hepatic_sacrococcigeal_rhabdomyosarcoma_Smooth_Trabecular_Fibroblast



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr8:37654369..37654415,+p1@GPR124
Hg19::chr8:37654427..37654436,+p3@GPR124
Hg19::chr8:37654457..37654468,+p2@GPR124


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
dense mesenchyme tissue1.26e-1173
epithelial vesicle1.85e-1178
somite3.67e-1171
presomitic mesoderm3.67e-1171
presumptive segmental plate3.67e-1171
dermomyotome3.67e-1171
trunk paraxial mesoderm3.67e-1171
paraxial mesoderm4.03e-1172
presumptive paraxial mesoderm4.03e-1172
muscle tissue1.25e-1064
musculature1.25e-1064
musculature of body1.25e-1064
vasculature5.39e-1078
vascular system5.39e-1078
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm5.59e-1083
skeletal muscle tissue5.95e-1062
striated muscle tissue5.95e-1062
myotome5.95e-1062
trunk mesenchyme1.05e-09122
tissue1.37e-09773
mesenchyme4.59e-09160
entire embryonic mesenchyme4.59e-09160
multi-cellular organism1.19e-08656
circulatory system1.31e-08112
multilaminar epithelium1.60e-0883
cardiovascular system2.29e-08109
vessel2.62e-0768
anatomical cluster3.08e-07373
epithelial tube open at both ends4.01e-0759
blood vessel4.01e-0759
blood vasculature4.01e-0759
vascular cord4.01e-0759
surface structure6.09e-0799


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90536.336201576962630.003930750035764890.0191279285707413
CTCF#1066435.360256373075030.0064925092527670.0281485812549186
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0327911848256024
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.032452276936306
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0322664249944468
FOSL1#8061339.7135797163731.59554825631833e-050.000372790747967853
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.0157735229204073
TFAP2A#7020316.5186343730450.0002218033880766340.0024964892819631
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00619245877490324
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.0141014834616881
ZNF143#7702313.50087655222790.0004062804962997170.00390570036386654



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.