Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:769

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:53, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:76879004..76879010,+p@chr10:76879004..76879010
+
Mm9::chr11:120593207..120593217,-p@chr11:120593207..120593217
-
Mm9::chr11:14020422..14020428,-p@chr11:14020422..14020428
-
Mm9::chr11:3977352..3977356,+p@chr11:3977352..3977356
+
Mm9::chr18:53695869..53695877,-p@chr18:53695869..53695877
-
Mm9::chr18:75117673..75117680,-p@chr18:75117673..75117680
-
Mm9::chr1:164811692..164811696,-p@chr1:164811692..164811696
-
Mm9::chr1:91177872..91177877,-p@chr1:91177872..91177877
-
Mm9::chr9:65246202..65246207,-p@chr9:65246202..65246207
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
lung6.05e-4614
respiratory tube6.05e-4614
respiration organ6.05e-4614
pair of lungs6.05e-4614
lung primordium6.05e-4614
lung bud6.05e-4614
epithelial bud8.90e-3817
thoracic cavity element8.90e-3817
thoracic segment organ8.90e-3817
thoracic cavity8.90e-3817
thoracic segment of trunk8.90e-3817
respiratory primordium8.90e-3817
endoderm of foregut8.90e-3817
epithelial fold4.71e-3220
respiratory tract2.21e-1541
respiratory system5.30e-1542
anatomical space6.87e-1157
subdivision of trunk2.60e-0966
endo-epithelium7.09e-0969
immaterial anatomical entity1.17e-0779
trunk region element1.17e-0779
foregut1.49e-0780


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}