Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3269

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:47, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr1:45914581..45914602,+p@chr1:45914581..45914602
+
Mm9::chr2:150753022..150753029,+p@chr2:150753022..150753029
+
Mm9::chr5:67281503..67281521,+p2@ENSMUST00000121056


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
somatic cell2.53e-23118
animal cell1.54e-21115
eukaryotic cell1.54e-21115
motile cell5.14e-1854
connective tissue cell4.61e-1546
mesenchymal cell4.61e-1546
hematopoietic cell4.25e-1332
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell4.25e-1332
hematopoietic stem cell4.25e-1332
angioblastic mesenchymal cell4.25e-1332
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell4.25e-1332
stem cell8.96e-1297
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell2.68e-1125
epithelial cell6.56e-1125
leukocyte1.96e-1017
nongranular leukocyte1.96e-1017
endo-epithelial cell1.11e-0915
lymphocyte1.13e-0913
common lymphoid progenitor1.13e-0913
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.38e-0912
somatic stem cell3.80e-0991
multi fate stem cell3.80e-0991
T cell1.45e-0811
pro-T cell1.45e-0811
endodermal cell3.04e-0820
nucleate cell3.65e-0816
mature alpha-beta T cell7.03e-089
alpha-beta T cell7.03e-089
immature T cell7.03e-089
mature T cell7.03e-089
immature alpha-beta T cell7.03e-089
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell4.37e-078

Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
connective tissue4.61e-1546
mucosa4.15e-0715


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}