Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4298

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:39, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4298_heart_left_Endothelial_acute_Renal_skeletal_tongue



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr3:159570899..159570917,+p25@SCHIP1
Hg19::chr3:159570919..159570930,+p44@SCHIP1
Hg19::chr3:159570936..159570956,+p16@SCHIP1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
blood vessel endothelium6.70e-2118
endothelium6.70e-2118
cardiovascular system endothelium6.70e-2118
simple squamous epithelium5.60e-2022
squamous epithelium9.00e-1725
circulatory system1.27e-12112
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm8.52e-1283
vasculature1.98e-1178
vascular system1.98e-1178
vessel7.76e-1168
cardiovascular system9.86e-11109
endothelial tube1.11e-099
arterial system endothelium1.11e-099
endothelium of artery1.11e-099
anatomical cluster3.30e-09373
anatomical conduit6.10e-09240
cell layer1.20e-08309
adult organism1.46e-08114
epithelium1.54e-08306
compound organ1.77e-0868
anatomical system1.77e-08624
anatomical group2.09e-08625
primary circulatory organ2.53e-0827
multi-cellular organism4.33e-08656
epithelial tube4.99e-08117
epithelial tube open at both ends1.70e-0759
blood vessel1.70e-0759
blood vasculature1.70e-0759
vascular cord1.70e-0759
vein2.08e-079
venous blood vessel2.08e-079
venous system2.08e-079
tube2.66e-07192


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.