Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4080

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:44, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4080_CD19_CD4_Dendritic_Peripheral_CD14_B_Eosinophils



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr21:45663884..45663922,-p@chr21:45663884..45663922
-
Hg19::chr21:45663952..45663967,-p@chr21:45663952..45663967
-
Hg19::chr2:227701085..227701125,-p@chr2:227701085..227701125
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte6.31e-36140
nongranular leukocyte1.56e-32119
hematopoietic stem cell4.34e-30172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell4.34e-30172
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell3.09e-29124
hematopoietic cell5.28e-29182
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell9.86e-27165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell9.86e-27165
lymphocyte5.25e-2353
common lymphoid progenitor5.25e-2353
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.77e-2252
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte1.95e-1942
classical monocyte6.21e-1745
lymphocyte of B lineage1.13e-1524
pro-B cell1.13e-1524
myeloid leukocyte2.19e-1176
B cell1.69e-1014
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.73e-1065
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell2.63e-1071
monopoietic cell8.79e-1063
monocyte8.79e-1063
monoblast8.79e-1063
promonocyte8.79e-1063
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell1.07e-0870
myeloid cell2.19e-08112
common myeloid progenitor2.19e-08112
T cell2.09e-0725
pro-T cell2.09e-0725
mesenchymal cell2.67e-07358
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemolymphoid system1.51e-15112
hematopoietic system2.38e-14102
blood island2.38e-14102
immune system5.27e-10115
bone marrow5.35e-0880
bone element6.70e-0886


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.