Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:860

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 21:22, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr10:25152282..25152323,+p@chr10:25152282..25152323
+
Mm9::chr10:25152382..25152425,+p@chr10:25152382..25152425
+
Mm9::chr11:30179442..30179465,-p@chr11:30179442..30179465
-
Mm9::chr1:51345950..51345986,+p3@Sdpr
Mm9::chr1:51346089..51346123,+p1@Sdpr
Mm9::chr1:51346129..51346159,+p2@Sdpr
Mm9::chr2:84475873..84475899,-p@chr2:84475873..84475899
-
Mm9::chr3:79689871..79689924,+p3@Fam198b


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
cardiovascular system1.28e-1423
circulatory system1.28e-1423
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.41e-1333
primary circulatory organ2.52e-1118
heart2.52e-1118
primitive heart tube2.52e-1118
primary heart field2.52e-1118
anterior lateral plate mesoderm2.52e-1118
heart tube2.52e-1118
heart primordium2.52e-1118
cardiac mesoderm2.52e-1118
cardiogenic plate2.52e-1118
heart rudiment2.52e-1118
trunk3.84e-1090
epithelial tube6.69e-1047
trunk region element2.29e-0979
lung2.58e-0814
respiratory tube2.58e-0814
respiration organ2.58e-0814
pair of lungs2.58e-0814
lung primordium2.58e-0814
lung bud2.58e-0814
multi-cellular organism4.26e-08333
epithelial bud5.35e-0817
compound organ3.04e-0743
anatomical space8.70e-0757
thoracic cavity element9.86e-0717
thoracic segment organ9.86e-0717
thoracic cavity9.86e-0717
thoracic segment of trunk9.86e-0717
respiratory primordium9.86e-0717
endoderm of foregut9.86e-0717


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}