Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1662

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 17:31, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1662_Eosinophils_Dendritic_Neutrophils_Whole_renal_splenic_giant



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:129308446..129308453,-p7@SLC15A4
Hg19::chr12:129308487..129308588,-p1@SLC15A4
Hg19::chr3:13057835..13057855,-p@chr3:13057835..13057855
-
Hg19::chr3:44552063..44552064,-p4@ZNF852
Hg19::chr6:42897306..42897321,+p5@CNPY3


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0006857oligopeptide transport0.00350288472860002
GO:0015833peptide transport0.00401801483574708



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte3.06e-32140
nongranular leukocyte2.18e-28119
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte9.10e-2542
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor1.05e-2265
monopoietic cell7.65e-2263
monocyte7.65e-2263
monoblast7.65e-2263
promonocyte7.65e-2263
myeloid leukocyte8.97e-2276
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell1.21e-21124
hematopoietic cell1.88e-21182
hematopoietic stem cell3.60e-21172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.60e-21172
classical monocyte5.71e-2145
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.01e-18165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.01e-18165
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell3.23e-1871
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell3.63e-1570
connective tissue cell4.63e-13365
mesenchymal cell1.80e-12358
stem cell2.37e-12444
somatic cell2.60e-12591
myeloid cell4.23e-12112
common myeloid progenitor4.23e-12112
somatic stem cell3.79e-11436
motile cell4.92e-11390
multi fate stem cell6.21e-11430
lymphocyte of B lineage1.38e-0924
pro-B cell1.38e-0924
intermediate monocyte3.38e-079
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte3.38e-079
lymphocyte7.91e-0753
common lymphoid progenitor7.91e-0753
granulocyte8.15e-078
animal cell8.68e-07679
eukaryotic cell8.68e-07679
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hematopoietic system1.14e-23102
blood island1.14e-23102
hemolymphoid system1.04e-21112
bone marrow7.50e-1780
immune system2.08e-15115
bone element2.94e-1486
lateral plate mesoderm6.00e-14216
connective tissue3.66e-12375
skeletal element9.22e-12101
skeletal system9.22e-12101
musculoskeletal system1.50e-08167


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.