Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3709

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:13, 5 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3709_schwannoma_CD14_corpus_Macrophage_prostate_optic_clear



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr18:21166386..21166479,-p1@NPC1
Hg19::chr18:21166649..21166681,-p4@NPC1
Hg19::chr18:21166757..21166776,-p5@NPC1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organ1.12e-23511
anatomical system1.12e-17625
anatomical group1.18e-17626
multi-cellular organism4.09e-14659
germ layer9.41e-13604
embryonic tissue9.41e-13604
presumptive structure9.41e-13604
epiblast (generic)9.41e-13604
embryonic structure1.52e-12605
developing anatomical structure1.52e-12605
embryo1.47e-11612
bone marrow1.37e-0880
bone element4.87e-0886
immune system8.87e-08115
skeletal element4.08e-07101
skeletal system4.08e-07101


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CTCFL#140690213.16431623931620.007433367036996010.0306778400370199
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.032508897383575
E2F4#1874312.66806031528440.0004917987006298980.00436759902169098
E2F6#187635.017155731697390.00791769806886330.032193275271121
EGR1#195834.988179094810140.008056488137383440.0320440080958256
ELF1#199734.258097958807540.01295179875054610.0461915349579389
FOSL2#2355211.28680040304110.0100534586973120.0376712533326838
FOXA1#3169311.08141974938550.000734755275698670.00580989599020997
FOXA2#3170324.63046375266526.68983856509345e-050.00107208846079453
GABPB1#255337.067683836182170.002832212825417420.015401097327594
HNF4A#3172215.42152690863580.005444210486686610.0246750813270435
IRF1#365937.63716375356390.002244692747297240.0127979837228397
JUND#372736.994663941871030.002921845042734990.015666627703984
NRF1#4899312.21027944771090.0005492172401020010.00470894830793965
PAX5#507936.669565531177830.003370290999677260.017281511278245
SIN3A#2594235.408884726815140.006318961977991520.0276486685667375
SMC3#9126210.02995522995520.0126656379767470.0457410894101968
SP1#666735.69838137814090.005403962701712170.0246305516541903
SREBF1#6720231.33723296032550.00133816265136180.00887511076049884
SREBF2#67212291.2955082742321.56525677906814e-050.000366369011091657
TFAP2A#7020316.5186343730450.0002218033880766340.00248177887800895
TFAP2C#7022310.80922860986020.0007916746575753130.00615603525891655
USF1#739136.361499277207960.00388404057290560.0190149211734725
YY1#752834.911170749853860.008441455341808260.0329108987025203
ZBTB7A#5134137.35190930787590.002516255860282270.0140097689408263
ZEB1#6935211.25895467836260.01010222676646330.0378105813239198



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.