Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3367

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:16, 12 September 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3367_Mesenchymal_Endothelial_Smooth_Placental_Fibroblast_Astrocyte_Keratinocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr13:33680891..33680895,-p@chr13:33680891..33680895
-
Hg19::chr19:39215203..39215210,+p@chr19:39215203..39215210
+
Hg19::chr2:27596177..27596179,+p@chr2:27596177..27596179
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
unilaminar epithelium1.24e-12138
vasculature1.42e-1179
vascular system1.42e-1179
trunk mesenchyme2.94e-11143
somite6.47e-1183
paraxial mesoderm6.47e-1183
presomitic mesoderm6.47e-1183
presumptive segmental plate6.47e-1183
trunk paraxial mesoderm6.47e-1183
presumptive paraxial mesoderm6.47e-1183
multilaminar epithelium2.59e-1082
dermomyotome5.46e-1070
epithelial tube2.55e-09118
vessel1.18e-0869
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.41e-0884
cell layer1.72e-08312
mesenchyme2.04e-08238
entire embryonic mesenchyme2.04e-08238
skeletal muscle tissue2.10e-0861
striated muscle tissue2.10e-0861
myotome2.10e-0861
cardiovascular system3.10e-08110
trunk6.88e-08216
blood vessel7.31e-0860
epithelial tube open at both ends7.31e-0860
blood vasculature7.31e-0860
vascular cord7.31e-0860
epithelium7.42e-08309
muscle tissue1.07e-0763
musculature1.07e-0763
musculature of body1.07e-0763
circulatory system1.66e-07113
multi-tissue structure2.93e-07347
artery3.31e-0742
arterial blood vessel3.31e-0742
arterial system3.31e-0742


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.