Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2049

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 12:00, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2049_CD14_Mast_Basophils_Eosinophils_Neutrophils_Peripheral_CD14CD16



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr10:135122318..135122339,-p4@TUBGCP2
Hg19::chr11:62321037..62321046,-p@chr11:62321037..62321046
-
Hg19::chr14:55738772..55738777,-p2@ENST00000556183
Hg19::chr9:108007969..108007987,+p@chr9:108007969..108007987
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0007020microtubule nucleation0.00376780878370423
GO:0005881cytoplasmic microtubule0.00376780878370423
GO:0000922spindle pole0.00973350602456925
GO:0005819spindle0.0183680678205581
GO:0000226microtubule cytoskeleton organization and biogenesis0.0192158247968915
GO:0005813centrosome0.0197809961144472
GO:0005815microtubule organizing center0.0197809961144472
GO:0005874microtubule0.0320263746614859
GO:0007017microtubule-based process0.0320263746614859
GO:0006461protein complex assembly0.0320263746614859
GO:0015630microtubule cytoskeleton0.0442717532085247



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
classical monocyte5.70e-5042
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte5.70e-5042
leukocyte2.28e-44136
myeloid leukocyte1.75e-4372
defensive cell8.72e-4248
phagocyte8.72e-4248
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell3.05e-4167
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor4.90e-3861
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell6.54e-3866
monopoietic cell1.47e-3559
monocyte1.47e-3559
monoblast1.47e-3559
promonocyte1.47e-3559
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell5.91e-34120
hematopoietic stem cell3.51e-32168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.51e-32168
nongranular leukocyte9.17e-32115
myeloid cell1.80e-29108
common myeloid progenitor1.80e-29108
hematopoietic cell2.91e-29177
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.23e-28161
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.23e-28161
stuff accumulating cell6.26e-2187
intermediate monocyte4.81e-149
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte4.81e-149
mesenchymal cell2.39e-10354
connective tissue cell1.10e-09361
motile cell6.94e-09386
Langerhans cell1.63e-075
dendritic cell3.47e-0710
conventional dendritic cell4.36e-078
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
bone marrow5.70e-3676
bone element4.59e-3282
hematopoietic system3.25e-2898
blood island3.25e-2898
skeletal element1.09e-2790
immune system2.24e-2793
hemolymphoid system5.82e-25108
skeletal system3.08e-23100
musculoskeletal system7.04e-09167
lateral plate mesoderm8.09e-09203
connective tissue8.52e-09371


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BRCA1#672210.09211532161190.0137713969900260.0484576304788021
CCNT2#90534.752151182721970.01386206996689490.0486979287992375
GATA3#2625213.6182581786030.00769665208093340.0316842982530786
JUND#372735.245997956403270.01043432751748420.0386600940683459
RFX5#599339.035933120396320.002144561191324070.0123791425557229
TAF1#687243.343046285745290.008005664898701650.0321047358735745



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.