Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:1090

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:19, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:83663167..83663179,-p1@ENSMUST00000135268
Mm9::chr11:83674115..83674133,+p@chr11:83674115..83674133
+
Mm9::chr11:83676311..83676322,+p@chr11:83676311..83676322
+
Mm9::chr11:83676376..83676387,+p@chr11:83676376..83676387
+
Mm9::chr11:83699177..83699208,+p@chr11:83699177..83699208
+
Mm9::chr11:83699371..83699381,+p@chr11:83699371..83699381
+
Mm9::chr11:83699594..83699604,+p@chr11:83699594..83699604
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
trunk region element1.46e-1979
trunk2.99e-1790
kidney3.48e-1714
kidney mesenchyme3.48e-1714
upper urinary tract3.48e-1714
kidney rudiment3.48e-1714
kidney field3.48e-1714
renal system4.58e-1619
subdivision of trunk9.46e-1566
urinary system structure1.17e-1418
cavitated compound organ4.79e-1221
lung8.17e-1014
respiratory tube8.17e-1014
respiration organ8.17e-1014
pair of lungs8.17e-1014
lung primordium8.17e-1014
lung bud8.17e-1014
immaterial anatomical entity4.19e-0979
abdomen element2.29e-0849
abdominal segment element2.29e-0849
abdominal segment of trunk2.29e-0849
abdomen2.29e-0849
anatomical space3.47e-0857
epithelial bud1.08e-0717
thoracic cavity element1.08e-0717
thoracic segment organ1.08e-0717
thoracic cavity1.08e-0717
thoracic segment of trunk1.08e-0717
respiratory primordium1.08e-0717
endoderm of foregut1.08e-0717
mesenchyme1.98e-0761
entire embryonic mesenchyme1.98e-0761


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}