Coexpression cluster:C744

Full id: C744_breast_salivary_parotid_submaxillary_seminal_small_ductus

Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr11:826136..826180,+	p2@EFCAB4A
Hg19::chr13:34922173..34922187,+	p@chr13:34922173..34922187 +
Hg19::chr15:41069078..41069092,-	p2@DNAJC17
Hg19::chr17:36763272..36763286,-	p@chr17:36763272..36763286 -
Hg19::chr18:20911089..20911104,-	p4@TMEM241
Hg19::chr18:20911109..20911117,-	p5@TMEM241
Hg19::chr22:31739395..31739404,-	p24@PATZ1
Hg19::chr7:94138905..94138932,+	p3@CASD1
Hg19::chr9:140063847..140063858,-	p2@MIR3621
Hg19::chr9:140063873..140063890,-	p1@MIR3621
Hg19::chr9:140064092..140064112,-	p3@MIR3621

Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data

---

No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br>disease_data<br>

---

Uber Anatomy

Ontology term	p-value	n
subdivision of digestive tract	1.05e-15	118
immaterial anatomical entity	5.46e-15	117
digestive system	1.68e-13	145
digestive tract	1.68e-13	145
primitive gut	1.68e-13	145
foregut	3.60e-13	87
anatomical space	4.56e-13	95
adult organism	4.75e-13	114
endoderm-derived structure	1.64e-11	160
endoderm	1.64e-11	160
presumptive endoderm	1.64e-11	160
male genital duct	6.62e-11	3
internal male genitalia	6.62e-11	3
organism subdivision	7.03e-11	264
thoracic segment of trunk	1.80e-10	52
trunk region element	3.01e-10	101
subdivision of trunk	5.67e-10	112
thoracic cavity element	4.71e-09	34
thoracic cavity	4.71e-09	34
thoracic segment organ	9.95e-09	35
respiratory system	1.70e-08	74
duct of male reproductive system	2.90e-08	4
epithelial bud	3.51e-08	37
major salivary gland	4.33e-08	2
lung	6.14e-08	22
respiratory tube	6.14e-08	22
respiration organ	6.14e-08	22
pair of lungs	6.14e-08	22
lung primordium	6.14e-08	22
lung bud	6.14e-08	22
open tracheal system trachea	7.62e-08	2
endo-epithelium	9.33e-08	82
throat	1.28e-07	2
trunk	2.57e-07	199
respiratory tract	4.55e-07	54

Disease

Ontology term	p-value	n
carcinoma	1.60e-10	106
thoracic cancer	1.97e-08	4
breast cancer	1.97e-08	4
cell type cancer	6.89e-08	143
adenocarcinoma	9.43e-07	25

Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data

---

Novel motifs

JASPAR motifs

Motifs	-log10(p-value)
{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}

ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data

---

(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF	#promoters	Enrichment	p-value	q-value
CTCF#10664	6	2.92377620349547	0.0082120479432594	0.0324133815247947
E2F1#1869	6	2.67675775357054	0.0127881671753266	0.04601493166663
EP300#2033	6	3.69487730521265	0.00244128806655223	0.0137470040644119
FOXA1#3169	5	5.03700897699339	0.00173389791582009	0.0106722397707646
GATA3#2625	5	12.3802347078209	2.5558774340898e-05	0.000553114967548496
MYC#4609	7	3.32327028193326	0.00150133599624924	0.00959126682849731
NR3C1#2908	4	5.4447357567902	0.00448160080404692	0.0212038555030288
SUZ12#23512	3	13.6679402484717	0.0011615972136501	0.00794161111523978

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data

---

This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.