Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3593

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 23:08, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr7:128882915..128882919,+p@chr7:128882915..128882919
+
Mm9::chr7:129049134..129049146,+p@chr7:129049134..129049146
+
Mm9::chr7:129049162..129049176,+p@chr7:129049162..129049176
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
lung2.31e-1814
respiratory tube2.31e-1814
respiration organ2.31e-1814
pair of lungs2.31e-1814
lung primordium2.31e-1814
lung bud2.31e-1814
epithelial bud1.47e-1717
thoracic cavity element1.13e-1417
thoracic segment organ1.13e-1417
thoracic cavity1.13e-1417
thoracic segment of trunk1.13e-1417
respiratory primordium1.13e-1417
endoderm of foregut1.13e-1417
epithelial fold1.69e-1420
renal system4.54e-1319
urinary system structure2.05e-1118
kidney5.75e-1014
kidney mesenchyme5.75e-1014
upper urinary tract5.75e-1014
kidney rudiment5.75e-1014
kidney field5.75e-1014
zone of skin9.82e-105
skin epidermis9.82e-105
skin of body9.82e-105
integument9.82e-105
surface9.82e-105
outer epithelium9.82e-105
integumental system9.82e-105
enveloping layer of ectoderm9.82e-105
subdivision of trunk1.50e-0866
trunk region element3.10e-0879
cavitated compound organ9.08e-0821
trunk1.61e-0790
organism subdivision7.25e-07150


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}