Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3618

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 23:10, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr7:31822913..31822938,-p@chr7:31822913..31822938
-
Mm9::chr7:31822943..31822968,-p@chr7:31822943..31822968
-
Mm9::chr9:114690929..114691005,-p1@Cmtm7


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemolymphoid system6.81e-2148
immune system6.81e-2148
hematopoietic system8.77e-2045
blood island8.77e-2045
lateral plate mesoderm1.15e-1687
mesoderm3.16e-16120
mesoderm-derived structure3.16e-16120
presumptive mesoderm3.16e-16120
hemopoietic organ4.41e-1229
immune organ4.41e-1229
gland of gut1.02e-1024
thymus2.19e-1023
neck2.19e-1023
respiratory system epithelium2.19e-1023
hemolymphoid system gland2.19e-1023
pharyngeal epithelium2.19e-1023
thymic region2.19e-1023
pharyngeal gland2.19e-1023
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm2.19e-1023
thymus primordium2.19e-1023
early pharyngeal endoderm2.19e-1023
pharynx2.67e-0924
upper respiratory tract2.67e-0924
chordate pharynx2.67e-0924
pharyngeal arch system2.67e-0924
pharyngeal region of foregut2.67e-0924
musculoskeletal system3.42e-0932
connective tissue3.56e-0946
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure5.38e-0935
bone element8.75e-0922
skeletal element8.75e-0922
skeletal system8.75e-0922
segment of respiratory tract1.01e-0827
bone marrow1.78e-0816


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}