Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2684

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 18:52, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr11:54776405..54776455,-p2@Tnip1
Mm9::chr4:40186746..40186760,-p3@Ddx58
Mm9::chr9:5308842..5308873,+p1@Casp4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
hemolymphoid system2.08e-1448
immune system2.08e-1448
lateral plate mesoderm3.28e-1487
hematopoietic system1.22e-1245
blood island1.22e-1245
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure4.21e-1135
mesoderm7.79e-11120
mesoderm-derived structure7.79e-11120
presumptive mesoderm7.79e-11120
hemopoietic organ4.59e-1029
immune organ4.59e-1029
segment of respiratory tract2.78e-0927
gland of gut1.42e-0824
pharynx1.66e-0824
upper respiratory tract1.66e-0824
chordate pharynx1.66e-0824
pharyngeal arch system1.66e-0824
pharyngeal region of foregut1.66e-0824
thymus1.72e-0823
neck1.72e-0823
respiratory system epithelium1.72e-0823
hemolymphoid system gland1.72e-0823
pharyngeal epithelium1.72e-0823
thymic region1.72e-0823
pharyngeal gland1.72e-0823
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm1.72e-0823
thymus primordium1.72e-0823
early pharyngeal endoderm1.72e-0823
endoderm-derived structure9.99e-08118
endoderm9.99e-08118
presumptive endoderm9.99e-08118
digestive system2.41e-07116
digestive tract2.41e-07116
primitive gut2.41e-07116
organ component layer5.16e-0724


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}