Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:2901

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:12, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr14:30869511..30869525,-p@chr14:30869511..30869525
-
Mm9::chr14:30869536..30869545,-p@chr14:30869536..30869545
-
Mm9::chr14:30869565..30869570,-p@chr14:30869565..30869570
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
epididymis1.04e-153
excretory tube1.04e-153
mesonephric epithelium1.04e-153
mesonephric tubule1.04e-153
nephric duct1.04e-153
kidney epithelium1.04e-153
renal duct1.04e-153
mesonephric duct1.04e-153
pronephric duct1.04e-153
mesonephros4.91e-124
duct of male reproductive system4.91e-124
male genital duct4.91e-124
pronephros4.91e-124
internal male genitalia4.91e-124
nephrogenic cord4.91e-124
urogenital ridge4.91e-124
pronephric mesoderm4.91e-124
rostral part of nephrogenic cord4.91e-124
presumptive pronephric mesoderm4.91e-124
intermediate mesoderm9.23e-0814
duct2.84e-077
seminiferous tubule of testis9.80e-072
epithelium of male gonad9.80e-072
epithelium of gonad9.80e-072
epithelial cord9.80e-072
sex cord9.80e-072
testis sex cord9.80e-072
genital ridge9.80e-072
primitive sex cord of indifferent gonad9.80e-072
coelomic epithelium9.80e-072


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}