Personal tools

MCL coexpression mm9:3227

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:43, 11 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Phase1 CAGE Peaks

 Short description
Mm9::chr1:133904183..133904211,+p1@Elk4
Mm9::chr1:133904217..133904250,+p5@Elk4
Mm9::chr7:71083748..71083819,-p1@Klf13


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


no results for this coexpression

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster over median <br>Analyst:





Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br><br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
respiratory tract2.54e-1141
respiratory system3.64e-1142
endo-epithelium1.72e-1069
foregut2.96e-1080
hemopoietic organ7.34e-0929
immune organ7.34e-0929
mixed endoderm/mesoderm-derived structure1.39e-0835
subdivision of digestive tract4.77e-08114
endoderm-derived structure6.75e-08118
endoderm6.75e-08118
presumptive endoderm6.75e-08118
organism subdivision8.13e-08150
segment of respiratory tract9.48e-0827
digestive system1.22e-07116
digestive tract1.22e-07116
primitive gut1.22e-07116
pharynx1.88e-0724
upper respiratory tract1.88e-0724
chordate pharynx1.88e-0724
pharyngeal arch system1.88e-0724
pharyngeal region of foregut1.88e-0724
thymus3.50e-0723
neck3.50e-0723
respiratory system epithelium3.50e-0723
hemolymphoid system gland3.50e-0723
pharyngeal epithelium3.50e-0723
thymic region3.50e-0723
pharyngeal gland3.50e-0723
entire pharyngeal arch endoderm3.50e-0723
thymus primordium3.50e-0723
early pharyngeal endoderm3.50e-0723
gut epithelium4.96e-0755
gland of gut5.22e-0724
unilaminar epithelium6.97e-0766


TFBS overrepresentation<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs




JASPAR motifs


Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}