Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2373

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 13:56, 19 October 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2373_Mesenchymal_Renal_leiomyoblastoma_Hepatic_Pericytes_Fibroblast_Smooth



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr16:447209..447225,+p2@NME4
Hg19::chr16:447226..447242,+p3@NME4
Hg19::chr16:447255..447266,+p4@NME4
Hg19::chr16:447267..447272,+p6@NME4


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
mesenchyme5.65e-22160
entire embryonic mesenchyme5.65e-22160
trunk mesenchyme1.91e-20122
epithelial vesicle5.55e-2078
trunk2.75e-18199
epithelial tube4.65e-18117
multilaminar epithelium4.86e-1883
somite5.65e-1871
presomitic mesoderm5.65e-1871
presumptive segmental plate5.65e-1871
dermomyotome5.65e-1871
trunk paraxial mesoderm5.65e-1871
unilaminar epithelium7.29e-18148
dense mesenchyme tissue8.34e-1873
paraxial mesoderm2.01e-1772
presumptive paraxial mesoderm2.01e-1772
vasculature3.46e-1778
vascular system3.46e-1778
muscle tissue3.65e-1764
musculature3.65e-1764
musculature of body3.65e-1764
skeletal muscle tissue3.77e-1762
striated muscle tissue3.77e-1762
myotome3.77e-1762
organism subdivision5.05e-16264
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.03e-1583
vessel3.32e-1468
epithelial tube open at both ends3.78e-1459
blood vessel3.78e-1459
blood vasculature3.78e-1459
vascular cord3.78e-1459
artery1.25e-1342
arterial blood vessel1.25e-1342
arterial system1.25e-1342
cardiovascular system6.98e-12109
circulatory system1.43e-11112
cell layer1.91e-10309
systemic artery2.62e-1033
systemic arterial system2.62e-1033
epithelium3.20e-10306
subdivision of trunk1.14e-08112
multi-tissue structure2.54e-07342
abdominal segment of trunk9.65e-0760
abdomen9.65e-0760


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
CCNT2#90546.336201576962630.0006203100587215640.00511766823784039
CTCFL#140690419.74647435897446.5732084880439e-060.000192728613498825
E2F1#186944.907389214879320.001724022357361790.0106428165847327
E2F6#187645.017155731697390.00157802193473060.00996354711573236
EGR1#195844.988179094810140.001615011500076050.0101382572613117
ETS1#211349.728760922202340.0001115955317418140.00154431240752395
HEY1#2346244.040111043105710.00375304636917980.0185844393224963
HMGN3#932448.178547723350590.0002234570284440470.00247982452381977
JUND#372746.994663941871030.000417684217818580.00391373784539339
PAX5#507946.669565531177830.0005052774169483260.0044356281540444
SIN3A#2594245.408884726815140.001168172384885160.00795583669416504
TAF1#687243.343046285745290.008005664898701650.0321863046678024
YY1#752844.911170749853860.00171871838055440.0106731614310097
ZBTB7A#5134147.35190930787590.000342223540015990.00346265106527126



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.