Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C1188

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C1188_Urothelial_Gingival_Keratinocyte_Mallassezderived_Bronchial_Tracheal_Prostate



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr13:75017232..75017235,+ p@chr13:75017232..75017235
+
Hg19::chr14:21510511..21510528,+ p1@RNASE7
Hg19::chr14:67878804..67878812,- p3@PLEK2
Hg19::chr14:67878829..67878909,- p1@PLEK2
Hg19::chr19:3136220..3136277,+ p1@GNA15
Hg19::chr2:74649337..74649349,+ p2@WDR54
Hg19::chr3:12800723..12800747,- p2@TMEM40


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0007207muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, phospholipase C activating pathway0.0392052976735397



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data
disease_data


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure1.78e-18160
endoderm1.78e-18160
presumptive endoderm1.78e-18160
respiratory system9.63e-1474
orifice1.70e-1236
digestive system4.98e-12145
digestive tract4.98e-12145
primitive gut4.98e-12145
endo-epithelium1.30e-1082
oral opening1.81e-1022
respiratory tract2.75e-0954
epithelial bud5.37e-0937
urothelium5.38e-095
surface structure6.04e-0999
anatomical space1.07e-0895
subdivision of digestive tract2.70e-08118
mouth2.99e-0829
stomodeum2.99e-0829
epithelial fold5.83e-0847
neck6.19e-0810
foregut7.69e-0887
extraembryonic membrane9.19e-0814
membranous layer9.19e-0814
pharyngeal arch system1.16e-0718
anterior region of body1.26e-0762
craniocervical region1.26e-0762
urinary system structure1.44e-0747
transitional epithelium2.35e-076
mucosa2.58e-0720
renal system2.68e-0748
respiratory system epithelium2.90e-0728
immaterial anatomical entity4.20e-07117
thoracic cavity element4.42e-0734
thoracic cavity4.42e-0734
organism subdivision6.73e-07264
thoracic segment organ9.21e-0735
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
squamous cell carcinoma1.54e-1514


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.12.0712
MA0004.10.502801
MA0006.10.904424
MA0007.11.21493
MA0009.10.973289
MA0014.10.187674
MA0017.10.380797
MA0019.10.652951
MA0024.10.867125
MA0025.11.10816
MA0027.12.59001
MA0028.10.35747
MA0029.10.886702
MA0030.10.875089
MA0031.10.809638
MA0038.10.60704
MA0040.10.892629
MA0041.10.521615
MA0042.10.48922
MA0043.10.973609
MA0046.10.962263
MA0048.11.25271
MA0050.10.490116
MA0051.10.602745
MA0052.10.896548
MA0055.10.158296
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.369442
MA0058.10.406232
MA0059.10.404929
MA0060.10.224688
MA0061.10.575931
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.607474
MA0067.11.29359
MA0068.10.162298
MA0069.10.958358
MA0070.10.947018
MA0071.10.567661
MA0072.10.942461
MA0073.10.126287
MA0074.10.60198
MA0076.10.422297
MA0077.10.934645
MA0078.10.703614
MA0081.10.405093
MA0083.10.980893
MA0084.11.48179
MA0087.10.939982
MA0088.10.0723293
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.436918
MA0091.10.505453
MA0092.10.467172
MA0093.10.344385
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.621149
MA0101.10.918548
MA0103.11.58817
MA0105.11.14871
MA0106.11.56379
MA0107.10.274127
MA0108.20.806528
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.45062
MA0113.10.665691
MA0114.10.269076
MA0115.11.21667
MA0116.12.97215
MA0117.11.01134
MA0119.10.388712
MA0122.11.03753
MA0124.11.17486
MA0125.11.0901
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.722072
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.00402
MA0136.10.614215
MA0139.10.547495
MA0140.10.564957
MA0141.10.403171
MA0142.10.777365
MA0143.10.66587
MA0144.10.254954
MA0145.10.581146
MA0146.10.547931
MA0147.10.281049
MA0148.10.528066
MA0149.10.555119
MA0062.20.563664
MA0035.20.564239
MA0039.20.403603
MA0138.20.704862
MA0002.20.213296
MA0137.20.36398
MA0104.20.223944
MA0047.20.636643
MA0112.20.556641
MA0065.20.0828768
MA0150.10.430951
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.571637
MA0153.11.07307
MA0154.10.685508
MA0155.10.534073
MA0156.11.7082
MA0157.10.749547
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.770207
MA0160.10.543522
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.25944
MA0163.11.30651
MA0164.11.62495
MA0080.20.911393
MA0018.20.650405
MA0099.20.572
MA0079.20.263996
MA0102.21.51913
MA0258.10.245543
MA0259.10.289405
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
TFAP2A#702037.079414731304980.006452554472180970.0280300447766454



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.