Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2585

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2585_somatostatinoma_parotid_small_pancreas_smallcell_Alveolar_salivary



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

  Short description
Hg19::chr1:43736324..43736409,+ p1@TMEM125
Hg19::chr1:43751230..43751274,- p1@C1orf210
Hg19::chr1:43751276..43751293,- p2@C1orf210
Hg19::chr6:27218970..27219009,+ p2@PRSS16


Enriched pathways on this co-expression clusterSummary:
Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.
Analyst: Emmanuel Dimont

link to source dataset
data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary: Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset
data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression clusterSummary:To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. Analyst: Hideya Kawaji

links to source dataset

cell_data
uberon_data
disease_data


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial cell2.52e-25253
endo-epithelial cell2.92e-1842
endodermal cell9.30e-1558
epithelial cell of alimentary canal5.12e-0920
respiratory epithelial cell1.37e-0813
germ line cell7.18e-087
germ cell7.18e-087
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
endoderm-derived structure4.95e-23160
endoderm4.95e-23160
presumptive endoderm4.95e-23160
digestive system2.28e-18145
digestive tract2.28e-18145
primitive gut2.28e-18145
subdivision of digestive tract1.57e-16118
anatomical space4.21e-1395
immaterial anatomical entity1.19e-12117
endo-epithelium2.73e-1182
respiratory system8.07e-1174
reproductive structure2.78e-1059
reproductive system2.78e-1059
renal system1.13e-0948
trunk region element1.55e-09101
epithelial bud2.35e-0937
urinary system structure3.24e-0947
reproductive organ3.50e-0948
foregut4.78e-0987
organ6.14e-09503
orifice6.26e-0936
thoracic cavity element6.71e-0834
thoracic cavity6.71e-0834
organ system subdivision1.35e-07223
thoracic segment organ1.71e-0735
male organism1.73e-0722
male reproductive system1.73e-0722
epithelial fold2.17e-0747
respiratory tract2.19e-0754
subdivision of trunk2.21e-07112
organ part2.25e-07218
male reproductive organ2.40e-0711
gastrointestinal system3.35e-0725
internal genitalia3.72e-0725
intestine6.50e-0717
adult organism7.05e-07114
Disease
Ontology termp-valuen
carcinoma1.87e-18106
cell type cancer4.26e-12143
squamous cell carcinoma2.01e-1114
adenocarcinoma5.88e-0925


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression clusterSummary:The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. Analyst: Michiel de Hoon

link to source data
Novel motifs
data

Jaspar motifs
data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.443649
MA0004.10.71247
MA0006.10.532262
MA0007.10.6918
MA0009.11.20602
MA0014.10.0695829
MA0017.10.577281
MA0019.10.873355
MA0024.11.09684
MA0025.11.34373
MA0027.12.83281
MA0028.11.35734
MA0029.11.11704
MA0030.11.10506
MA0031.11.03735
MA0038.10.824639
MA0040.11.12314
MA0041.10.732902
MA0042.10.697662
MA0043.11.20635
MA0046.11.19471
MA0048.11.30988
MA0050.10.69864
MA0051.10.820063
MA0052.11.12718
MA0055.10.791759
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.69331
MA0058.10.605914
MA0059.10.604454
MA0060.10.393285
MA0061.10.360128
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.825101
MA0067.11.53181
MA0068.10.841508
MA0069.11.19071
MA0070.11.17908
MA0071.10.782546
MA0072.11.1744
MA0073.10.214613
MA0074.10.819248
MA0076.12.5647
MA0077.11.16637
MA0078.10.926725
MA0081.10.604638
MA0083.11.21381
MA0084.11.72172
MA0087.11.17185
MA0088.10.182167
MA0089.10
MA0090.12.61689
MA0091.10.715356
MA0092.11.6149
MA0093.10.535768
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.83965
MA0101.10.539569
MA0103.12.23207
MA0105.10.232357
MA0106.10.869173
MA0107.10.453492
MA0108.21.03412
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.655276
MA0113.10.886811
MA0114.10.447443
MA0115.11.45393
MA0116.10.457606
MA0117.11.24497
MA0119.10.586221
MA0122.11.27173
MA0124.11.41151
MA0125.11.32534
MA0130.10
MA0131.10.94608
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.23748
MA0136.10.832277
MA0139.10.344952
MA0140.10.779643
MA0141.10.602484
MA0142.11.00381
MA0143.10.887001
MA0144.10.430413
MA0145.11.70272
MA0146.10.8309
MA0147.10.46175
MA0148.10.739888
MA0149.10.769072
MA0062.20.931615
MA0035.20.778873
MA0039.21.5472
MA0138.20.928035
MA0002.20.379056
MA0137.20.558189
MA0104.20.392359
MA0047.20.856092
MA0112.20.187982
MA0065.20.577908
MA0150.10.633493
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.78681
MA0153.11.30799
MA0154.10.649108
MA0155.10.533581
MA0156.10.560797
MA0157.10.97481
MA0158.10
MA0159.12.03616
MA0160.10.756582
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.309472
MA0163.12.49771
MA0164.12.08227
MA0080.20.535868
MA0018.20.870662
MA0099.20.7872
MA0079.22.72671
MA0102.21.75932
MA0258.10.418966
MA0259.10.471671
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysisSummary: For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained.
Analyst: Erik Arner

link to source dataset

data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
BCL3#602217.27355140186920.004834494208076070.0226762660826937
FOXA2#3170212.31523187633260.009361916285467240.0353475714883017
HNF4A#3172211.56614518147680.01057585681762490.0390735782572495
HNF4G#3174214.37671126322340.006924169980439180.0293071282102163
TAF1#687243.343046285745290.008005664898701650.0322496195462278



Relative expression of the co-expression clusterSummary:Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression.
Analyst:NA

link to data source
data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.