Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3604: Difference between revisions

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Coexpression_clusters
{
|full_id=C3604_Mesenchymal_Alveolar_Renal_Hair_Fibroblast_Hepatic_Smooth

Latest revision as of 12:29, 17 September 2013


Full id: C3604_Mesenchymal_Alveolar_Renal_Hair_Fibroblast_Hepatic_Smooth



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr17:1389027..1389094,-p1@MYO1C
Hg19::chr17:1394912..1394935,-p4@MYO1C
Hg19::chr17:1394940..1394987,-p2@MYO1C


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
organism subdivision4.76e-24264
trunk8.11e-22199
mesenchyme6.27e-20160
entire embryonic mesenchyme6.27e-20160
epithelial vesicle8.06e-1878
multilaminar epithelium3.07e-1783
trunk mesenchyme7.27e-17122
somite1.20e-1571
presomitic mesoderm1.20e-1571
presumptive segmental plate1.20e-1571
dermomyotome1.20e-1571
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.20e-1571
surface structure1.33e-1599
dense mesenchyme tissue3.48e-1573
epithelial tube6.98e-15117
paraxial mesoderm8.34e-1572
presumptive paraxial mesoderm8.34e-1572
unilaminar epithelium9.43e-15148
muscle tissue1.89e-1364
musculature1.89e-1364
musculature of body1.89e-1364
skeletal muscle tissue3.21e-1362
striated muscle tissue3.21e-1362
myotome3.21e-1362
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.27e-1183
integument3.49e-1146
integumental system3.49e-1146
skin of body4.31e-1141
multi-tissue structure1.42e-10342
vasculature3.89e-1078
vascular system3.89e-1078
multi-cellular organism1.05e-09656
epithelial tube open at both ends1.25e-0959
blood vessel1.25e-0959
blood vasculature1.25e-0959
vascular cord1.25e-0959
subdivision of trunk1.61e-09112
vessel2.48e-0968
artery9.65e-0942
arterial blood vessel9.65e-0942
arterial system9.65e-0942
endoderm-derived structure1.58e-08160
endoderm1.58e-08160
presumptive endoderm1.58e-08160
cell layer2.25e-08309
epithelium3.10e-08306
anatomical system5.57e-08624
anatomical group7.48e-08625
organ component layer8.35e-0866
compound organ4.25e-0768
systemic artery4.57e-0733
systemic arterial system4.57e-0733
primordium5.43e-07160
circulatory system5.52e-07112


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.17.68548
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.11.5435
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.14.7105
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.11.58389
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.904546
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.10.190716
MA0056.10
MA0057.10.333427
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.11.15625
MA0063.10
MA0066.10.941452
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.11.04561
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.116.7733
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.12.03569
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.10.642957
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.10.628063
MA0105.12.3269
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.11.3784
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.11.39371
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.10.531867
MA0145.11.37817
MA0146.14.51393
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.22.96208
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.27.95144
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.20.666381
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.731309
MA0065.20.277623
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.11.31345
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.15.21222
MA0163.18.4432
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.213.0679
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


(#promoters = Number of promoters in this coexpression cluster that have ChIP signal of the TF)

TF#promotersEnrichmentp-valueq-value
E2F1#186934.907389214879320.008460985347239390.0324790255699024



Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.