Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C2245

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 14:21, 21 May 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C2245_Mast_CD14_Synoviocyte_Neutrophils_Dendritic_CD14CD16_Whole



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr12:8276189..8276197,+p6@CLEC4A
Hg19::chr1:158801195..158801202,+p5@MNDA
Hg19::chr7:76829125..76829143,-p1@FGL2
Hg19::chr7:76829145..76829167,-p2@FGL2


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


GO IDGO nameFDR corrected p-value
GO:0005577fibrinogen complex0.0476751007987573



Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
leukocyte1.66e-35140
myeloid leukocyte2.56e-3376
granulocyte monocyte progenitor cell4.97e-2971
nongranular leukocyte5.76e-29119
hematopoietic stem cell1.08e-28172
angioblastic mesenchymal cell1.08e-28172
macrophage dendritic cell progenitor2.02e-2865
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell5.97e-28124
CD14-positive, CD16-negative classical monocyte7.98e-2842
monopoietic cell2.28e-2763
monocyte2.28e-2763
monoblast2.28e-2763
promonocyte2.28e-2763
hematopoietic oligopotent progenitor cell1.09e-26165
hematopoietic multipotent progenitor cell1.09e-26165
myeloid lineage restricted progenitor cell4.63e-2670
hematopoietic cell6.66e-25182
classical monocyte4.61e-2445
myeloid cell2.06e-23112
common myeloid progenitor2.06e-23112
mesenchymal cell3.51e-08358
intermediate monocyte1.57e-079
CD14-positive, CD16-positive monocyte1.57e-079
connective tissue cell2.75e-07365
granulocyte7.94e-078
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
adult organism1.90e-34115
hematopoietic system2.62e-32102
blood island2.62e-32102
hemolymphoid system3.13e-27112
bone marrow1.26e-2480
bone element5.71e-2186
skeletal element4.30e-17101
skeletal system4.30e-17101
lateral plate mesoderm2.54e-16216
immune system4.85e-16115
musculoskeletal system2.96e-15167
neural tube1.59e-0857
neural rod1.59e-0857
future spinal cord1.59e-0857
neural keel1.59e-0857
tissue3.13e-08787
blood3.62e-0815
haemolymphatic fluid3.62e-0815
organism substance3.62e-0815
anterior neural tube6.12e-0742
connective tissue9.36e-07375


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.