Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4595

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 22:10, 22 January 2013 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4595_iPS_Fibroblast_Alveolar_meningioma_Endothelial_choriocarcinoma_Osteoblast



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:34213016..34213037,+p@chr6:34213016..34213037
+
Hg19::chr6:34213226..34213258,+p@chr6:34213226..34213258
+
Hg19::chr6:34213536..34213558,+p@chr6:34213536..34213558
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
animal cell6.59e-30679
eukaryotic cell6.59e-30679
embryonic cell2.65e-24250
mesodermal cell3.74e-19121
native cell7.60e-19722
epithelial cell3.56e-16253
somatic cell2.81e-15588
contractile cell9.55e-1259
electrically responsive cell1.18e-1161
electrically active cell1.18e-1161
non-terminally differentiated cell6.25e-11106
muscle cell1.34e-1055
endothelial cell2.60e-1036
muscle precursor cell3.67e-1058
myoblast3.67e-1058
multi-potent skeletal muscle stem cell3.67e-1058
smooth muscle cell1.47e-0943
smooth muscle myoblast1.47e-0943
lining cell5.77e-0958
barrier cell5.77e-0958
meso-epithelial cell7.63e-0945
blood vessel endothelial cell8.54e-0918
embryonic blood vessel endothelial progenitor cell8.54e-0918
squamous epithelial cell2.77e-0863
epithelial cell of nephron5.42e-0815
endothelial cell of vascular tree5.81e-0824
vascular associated smooth muscle cell1.84e-0732
kidney cortical cell7.13e-0712
renal cortical epithelial cell7.13e-0712
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
epithelial vesicle1.58e-1378
unilaminar epithelium2.94e-13148
vessel3.62e-1368
epithelial tube open at both ends4.65e-1359
blood vessel4.65e-1359
blood vasculature4.65e-1359
vascular cord4.65e-1359
vasculature8.94e-1378
vascular system8.94e-1378
epithelial tube1.17e-12117
artery1.63e-1142
arterial blood vessel1.63e-1142
arterial system1.63e-1142
somite1.10e-1071
presomitic mesoderm1.10e-1071
presumptive segmental plate1.10e-1071
dermomyotome1.10e-1071
trunk paraxial mesoderm1.10e-1071
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.73e-1083
paraxial mesoderm4.24e-1072
presumptive paraxial mesoderm4.24e-1072
dense mesenchyme tissue5.54e-1073
multilaminar epithelium2.06e-0983
blood vessel endothelium8.54e-0918
endothelium8.54e-0918
cardiovascular system endothelium8.54e-0918
trunk mesenchyme2.66e-08122
systemic artery2.95e-0833
systemic arterial system2.95e-0833
skeletal muscle tissue3.21e-0862
striated muscle tissue3.21e-0862
myotome3.21e-0862
simple squamous epithelium4.38e-0822
nephron epithelium5.42e-0815
renal tubule5.42e-0815
nephron tubule5.42e-0815
nephron5.42e-0815
uriniferous tubule5.42e-0815
nephrogenic mesenchyme5.42e-0815
muscle tissue1.29e-0764
musculature1.29e-0764
musculature of body1.29e-0764
excretory tube2.32e-0716
kidney epithelium2.32e-0716
parenchyma2.74e-0715
cardiovascular system5.88e-07109
mesenchyme6.12e-07160
entire embryonic mesenchyme6.12e-07160
cortex of kidney7.13e-0712
renal parenchyma7.13e-0712


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)
MA0003.10.178364
MA0004.10.826076
MA0006.10.639288
MA0007.10.804807
MA0009.11.3275
MA0014.10.758317
MA0017.10.686276
MA0019.10.990656
MA0024.11.21731
MA0025.11.46617
MA0027.12.95767
MA0028.10.658629
MA0029.11.23771
MA0030.11.22561
MA0031.11.15713
MA0038.10.94098
MA0040.11.24388
MA0041.10.847069
MA0042.10.810843
MA0043.11.32783
MA0046.11.31611
MA0048.10.341392
MA0050.10.81185
MA0051.10.936307
MA0052.11.24796
MA0055.13.9895
MA0056.10
MA0057.11.59304
MA0058.10.716037
MA0059.10.714521
MA0060.10.492218
MA0061.11.15625
MA0063.10
MA0066.12.1667
MA0067.11.65513
MA0068.11.04561
MA0069.11.31207
MA0070.11.30033
MA0071.10.897953
MA0072.11.29561
MA0073.12.78116
MA0074.10.935474
MA0076.10.734647
MA0077.11.28751
MA0078.11.04495
MA0081.10.714712
MA0083.11.33535
MA0084.11.84562
MA0087.11.29304
MA0088.11.31954
MA0089.10
MA0090.10.751469
MA0091.10.829044
MA0092.10.785956
MA0093.11.55117
MA0095.10
MA0098.10
MA0100.10.956299
MA0101.10.646932
MA0103.11.52002
MA0105.12.3269
MA0106.10.986396
MA0107.10.556367
MA0108.21.15387
MA0109.10
MA0111.10.767139
MA0113.11.00436
MA0114.10.549955
MA0115.11.57693
MA0116.13.4624
MA0117.11.36676
MA0119.10.695578
MA0122.13.08252
MA0124.11.53432
MA0125.11.44766
MA0130.10
MA0131.11.06461
MA0132.10
MA0133.10
MA0135.11.35921
MA0136.10.948776
MA0139.10.440097
MA0140.10.894983
MA0141.10.712476
MA0142.11.12317
MA0143.11.00455
MA0144.11.31729
MA0145.10.273764
MA0146.10.107247
MA0147.10.565108
MA0148.10.854239
MA0149.10.884158
MA0062.20.449458
MA0035.20.894194
MA0039.21.15986
MA0138.21.04628
MA0002.20.476938
MA0137.21.60005
MA0104.20.491226
MA0047.20.973066
MA0112.20.731309
MA0065.20.760954
MA0150.10.744617
MA0151.10
MA0152.10.902317
MA0153.11.43021
MA0154.10.312019
MA0155.12.83144
MA0156.10.669101
MA0157.11.09377
MA0158.10
MA0159.10.565904
MA0160.10.871361
MA0161.10
MA0162.10.8915
MA0163.11.2663
MA0164.11.01792
MA0080.20.643061
MA0018.20.987913
MA0099.20.902716
MA0079.21.22771
MA0102.21.88331
MA0258.10.519674
MA0259.10.575594
MA0442.10



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.