Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3367

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:05, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3367_Mesenchymal_Endothelial_Smooth_Placental_Fibroblast_Astrocyte_Keratinocyte



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr13:33680891..33680895,-p@chr13:33680891..33680895
-
Hg19::chr19:39215203..39215210,+p@chr19:39215203..39215210
+
Hg19::chr2:27596177..27596179,+p@chr2:27596177..27596179
+


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
unilaminar epithelium1.21e-15148
vasculature3.33e-1378
vascular system3.33e-1378
somite2.64e-1171
presomitic mesoderm2.64e-1171
presumptive segmental plate2.64e-1171
dermomyotome2.64e-1171
trunk paraxial mesoderm2.64e-1171
multilaminar epithelium2.69e-1183
epithelial vesicle3.44e-1178
skeletal muscle tissue5.76e-1162
striated muscle tissue5.76e-1162
myotome5.76e-1162
paraxial mesoderm6.40e-1172
presumptive paraxial mesoderm6.40e-1172
dense mesenchyme tissue1.51e-1073
mesenchyme2.61e-10160
entire embryonic mesenchyme2.61e-10160
epithelial tube3.40e-10117
muscle tissue3.67e-1064
musculature3.67e-1064
musculature of body3.67e-1064
organism subdivision6.03e-10264
cardiovascular system1.26e-09109
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm1.50e-0983
trunk mesenchyme1.68e-09122
cell layer2.00e-09309
vessel3.63e-0968
epithelium6.03e-09306
circulatory system7.31e-09112
epithelial tube open at both ends1.18e-0859
blood vessel1.18e-0859
blood vasculature1.18e-0859
vascular cord1.18e-0859
artery1.29e-0742
arterial blood vessel1.29e-0742
arterial system1.29e-0742
trunk1.99e-07199
multi-tissue structure2.28e-07342


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.