Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C3471

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 16:09, 26 November 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C3471_CD4_thymus_CD8_blood_Peripheral_Whole_vein



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr14:98671428..98671434,-p2@ENST00000555776
Hg19::chr14:98671452..98671497,-p1@ENST00000555776
Hg19::chr3:59996251..59996255,-p@chr3:59996251..59996255
-


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
mature alpha-beta T cell6.61e-4018
alpha-beta T cell6.61e-4018
immature T cell6.61e-4018
mature T cell6.61e-4018
immature alpha-beta T cell6.61e-4018
CD8-positive, alpha-beta T cell7.35e-3311
T cell2.71e-2825
pro-T cell2.71e-2825
single nucleate cell2.00e-223
mononuclear cell2.00e-223
lymphoid lineage restricted progenitor cell2.21e-1852
lymphocyte5.38e-1853
common lymphoid progenitor5.38e-1853
nucleate cell2.90e-1755
nongranular leukocyte2.80e-13115
CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell1.19e-116
circulating cell1.65e-116
leukocyte8.77e-11136
natural killer cell1.95e-103
pro-NK cell1.95e-103
CD4-positive, alpha-beta thymocyte1.42e-081
naive thymus-derived CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell1.42e-081
mature CD4 single-positive thymocyte1.42e-081
resting double-positive thymocyte1.42e-081
double-positive blast1.42e-081
CD69-positive double-positive thymocyte1.42e-081
CD69-positive, CD4-positive single-positive thymocyte1.42e-081
CD4-positive, CD8-intermediate double-positive thymocyte1.42e-081
CD24-positive, CD4 single-positive thymocyte1.42e-081
hematopoietic stem cell3.56e-08168
angioblastic mesenchymal cell3.56e-08168
hematopoietic lineage restricted progenitor cell5.55e-08120
hematopoietic cell1.30e-07177
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
blood1.61e-2315
haemolymphatic fluid1.61e-2315
organism substance1.61e-2315
thymus2.17e-174
hemolymphoid system gland2.17e-174
thymic region2.17e-174
pharyngeal gland2.17e-174
thymus primordium2.17e-174
hemopoietic organ3.99e-177
immune organ3.99e-177
pharyngeal epithelium8.84e-126
hematopoietic system1.24e-0898
blood island1.24e-0898
hemolymphoid system1.20e-07108
neck2.94e-0710
gland of gut2.94e-0710
chordate pharynx2.94e-0710
pharyngeal region of foregut2.94e-0710


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.