Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4089

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 19:43, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4089_Renal_Mesenchymal_Fibroblast_Pericytes_acute_Preadipocyte_Urothelial



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr22:19929284..19929333,+p1@COMT
Hg19::chr22:19929336..19929371,+p4@COMT
Hg19::chr22:19929386..19929400,+p2@COMT


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
vasculature3.43e-1479
vascular system3.43e-1479
vessel4.67e-1269
splanchnic layer of lateral plate mesoderm5.53e-1284
somite9.43e-1283
paraxial mesoderm9.43e-1283
presomitic mesoderm9.43e-1283
presumptive segmental plate9.43e-1283
trunk paraxial mesoderm9.43e-1283
presumptive paraxial mesoderm9.43e-1283
multilaminar epithelium1.01e-1182
dermomyotome7.28e-1170
blood vessel1.36e-1060
epithelial tube open at both ends1.36e-1060
blood vasculature1.36e-1060
vascular cord1.36e-1060
artery4.45e-1042
arterial blood vessel4.45e-1042
arterial system4.45e-1042
skeletal muscle tissue8.72e-1061
striated muscle tissue8.72e-1061
myotome8.72e-1061
trunk mesenchyme1.15e-09143
epithelial tube3.24e-09118
cardiovascular system5.39e-09110
muscle tissue9.06e-0963
musculature9.06e-0963
musculature of body9.06e-0963
circulatory system1.40e-08113
systemic artery7.59e-0833
systemic arterial system7.59e-0833
organism subdivision1.82e-07365
multi-cellular organism3.01e-07659
anatomical system3.87e-07625
anatomical group5.35e-07626


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.