Personal tools

Coexpression cluster:C4564

From FANTOM5_SSTAR

Revision as of 20:08, 8 August 2012 by Autoedit (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search


Full id: C4564_pineal_small_argyrophil_colon_cord_Hepatocyte_B



Phase1 CAGE Peaks

Hg19::chr6:138820604..138820610,-p20@NHSL1
Hg19::chr6:138820612..138820623,-p10@NHSL1
Hg19::chr6:138820624..138820654,-p5@NHSL1


Enriched pathways on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b><br>Canonical pathway gene sets were compiled from Reactome, Wikipathways and KEGG. For the major signaling pathways, the transcriptionally-regulated genes (downstream targets) were obtained from Netpath. Combined, the canonical pathways and downstream targets totaled 489 human gene sets. The corresponding M. musculus gene sets were inferred by homology using the HomoloGene database. Enrichment for each of the canonical 489 pathways and gene sets included in the co-expression cluster was assessed by the hypergeometric probability. The resulting P values were also then adjusted by the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparisons.<br><b>Analyst: </b>Emmanuel Dimont<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No results for this coexpression

Enriched Gene Ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b> Results for GOStat analysis on co-expressed clusters. Each cluster with promoters mapping to at least two different genes was analysed with GOStat (PMID: 14962934) with default parameter. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br>data


No GOStat results

Enriched sample ontology terms on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>To summarize promoter activities (expression profile of a TSS region) across ~1000 samples, we performed enrichment analysis based on FANTOM5 Sample Ontology (FF ontology). The question here is “in which type of samples the promoter is more active”. To answer this question, we compared expressions (TPMs) in the samples associated with a sample ontology term and the rest of the samples by using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. To summarize ontologies enriched in this co-expression cluster, we ran the same analysis on an averaged expression profile of all promoters that make up. <b>Analyst:</b> Hideya Kawaji <br><br>links to source dataset<br><br>cell_data<br>uberon_data<br><br>


Cell Type
Ontology termp-valuen
endodermal cell2.40e-1159
endo-epithelial cell3.30e-0843
ectodermal cell8.94e-0771
Uber Anatomy
Ontology termp-valuen
central nervous system3.72e-1182
ectoderm-derived structure1.92e-10169
ectoderm4.84e-10173
presumptive ectoderm4.84e-10173
anterior region of body2.82e-09129
craniocervical region2.82e-09129
head3.16e-09123
neural plate3.65e-0986
presumptive neural plate3.65e-0986
neural tube3.90e-0957
neural rod3.90e-0957
future spinal cord3.90e-0957
neural keel3.90e-0957
regional part of nervous system7.18e-0994
nervous system7.18e-0994
neurectoderm1.44e-0890
organism subdivision1.79e-08365
regional part of brain3.09e-0859
exocrine gland4.10e-0831
exocrine system4.10e-0831
brain6.72e-0869
future brain6.72e-0869
organ8.02e-08511
pre-chordal neural plate1.82e-0761
multi-tissue structure3.55e-07347


Overrepresented TFBS (DNA) motifs on this co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>The values shown are the p-values for overrepresentation of the motif in this coexpression cluster. So a small p-value means a strong overrepresentation. <b>Analyst:</b> Michiel de Hoon <br><br>link to source data <br> Novel motifs <br>data <br><br> Jaspar motifs <br>data


Novel motifs



JASPAR motifs

Motifs-log10(p-value)

{{{tfbs_overrepresentation_jaspar}}}



ENCODE TF ChIP-seq peak enrichment analysis<b>Summary:</b> For each TF and each co-expression cluster, the number of promoters with ENCODE TF ChIP signal was compared with the rest of promoters from the robust set using Fisher's exact test. Clusters with significant ChIP enrichment (q <= 0.05) after Benjamini-Hochberg correction were retained. <br><b>Analyst:</b> Erik Arner<br><br>link to source dataset<br><br>data


No analysis results for this cluster

Relative expression of the co-expression cluster<b>Summary:</b>Co-expression clusters are compared against FANTOM5 samples to obtain relative expression. <br><b>Analyst:</b>NA<br><br>link to data source<br> data


This analysis result is provided for C0 - C305 clusters.